O'Brien Frances, McKee Gabrielle, Mooney Mary, O'Donnell Sharon, Moser Debra
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Aug;96(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
To test the effectiveness of an individualized educational intervention on knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
This multi-site, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 1947 patients with a diagnosis of ACS. Both groups received usual in-hospital education. Participants randomized to the intervention group received a 40-min one to one individualized education session, delivered using motivational interviewing techniques. The intervention was reinforced 1 month and 6 months later. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs were measured using the ACS Response Index. A total of 1136 patients (control, n=551; intervention, n=585) completed the questionnaire at baseline, 3 and 12 months. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. Ethical approval was obtained.
There was a significant effect of the intervention on mean knowledge (p<0.001), attitude (p=0.003) and belief (p<0.001) scores at 3 and 12 months.
Ensuring patients retain information post education has always been difficult to attain. This study demonstrated that patient education using motivational interviewing techniques and an individualized approach has the potential to alter knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about ACS among a high risk population.
This relatively short, simple and effective educational intervention could be delivered by nurses in multiple settings.
测试个体化教育干预对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)相关知识、态度和信念的有效性。
本多中心随机对照试验针对1947例诊断为ACS的患者开展。两组均接受常规的住院教育。随机分配至干预组的参与者接受一次40分钟的一对一个体化教育课程,采用动机性访谈技术进行授课。在1个月和6个月后强化干预。使用ACS反应指数测量知识、态度和信念。共有1136例患者(对照组,n = 551;干预组,n = 585)在基线、3个月和12个月时完成了问卷。采用重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。已获得伦理批准。
在3个月和12个月时,干预对平均知识得分(p < 0.001)、态度得分(p = 0.003)和信念得分(p < 0.001)有显著影响。
确保患者在教育后记住信息一直难以实现。本研究表明,采用动机性访谈技术和个体化方法进行患者教育有可能改变高危人群对ACS的知识、态度和信念。
这种相对简短、简单且有效的教育干预可由护士在多种环境中实施。