Centre for Forensic and Family Psychology, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Centre for Forensic and Family Psychology, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015 Oct;16(4):401-17. doi: 10.1177/1524838014537905. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
In this systematic review, the effectiveness of psychological treatment interventions for child molesters was examined. Studies were restricted to randomized control trials (RCTs), controlled trials, and cohort designs where recidivism had been used as the outcome variable. ASSIA, NCJRS, Medline, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Pro-requests Dissertations and Theses A&I, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Ten experts were contacted and the reference lists of 12 systematic reviews and 40 primary studies were observed. The number of hits was 3,019, of which 564 duplicates, 2,388 irrelevant references, and 38 that did not meet the inclusion criteria were removed. Fourteen studies using mixed samples had to be omitted because it was not possible to determine the recidivism rates of child molesters in the samples described. One RCT and 9 cohort studies were included in the data synthesis, providing 2,119 participants. In all, 52.1% received the intervention under investigation and 47.9% did not. The reported recidivism rates were 13.9% for the treated child molesters compared to 18.6% for the untreated child molesters. Three studies reported statistically significant lower recidivism rates for treated child molesters. Eight studies were assessed as weak. Four studies were assessed as having bias which increased the chance of finding a treatment effect and four studies were assessed as having bias which reduced the chance of finding a treatment effect. It was not possible to determine the direction of bias for two studies.
在这项系统评价中,研究了针对儿童性侵犯者的心理治疗干预措施的有效性。研究仅限于随机对照试验 (RCT)、对照试验和队列设计,其中将再犯作为结局变量。ASSIA、NCJRS、Medline、PsychINFO、EMBASE、Proquest Dissertations and Theses A&I 和 Cochrane Library 被检索。联系了 10 位专家,并观察了 12 项系统评价和 40 项原始研究的参考文献列表。共得到 3019 个检索结果,其中 564 个重复,2388 个不相关,38 个不符合纳入标准。由于无法确定描述样本中的儿童性侵犯者再犯率,因此必须排除使用混合样本的 14 项研究。纳入了 1 项 RCT 和 9 项队列研究,共纳入 2119 名参与者。共有 52.1%的参与者接受了研究中的干预措施,47.9%的参与者未接受干预。报告的治疗组儿童性侵犯者再犯率为 13.9%,未治疗组为 18.6%。有 3 项研究报告治疗组儿童性侵犯者的再犯率具有统计学意义较低。有 8 项研究被评估为弱。有 4 项研究被评估为存在偏倚,增加了发现治疗效果的可能性,有 4 项研究被评估为存在偏倚,降低了发现治疗效果的可能性。有 2 项研究的偏倚方向无法确定。