• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的五项完美指标结果:拉丁美洲医院的前100例病例

Pentafecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: first 100 cases in Latinoamerican Hospital.

作者信息

Gárate J, Sánchez-Salas R, Valero R, Matheus R, León A, Dávila H

机构信息

Unidad de Cirugía Robótica, Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela.

Unidad de Cirugía Robótica, Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela.

出版信息

Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Jan-Feb;39(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2013.12.014
PMID:24974068
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard treatment for cancer control in the long term. The rise of minimally invasive surgery and new technologies have yielded better results and enabled us to pursue more ambitious objectives. The main works still use the trifecta as classic presentation, but this does not cover all aspects of surgery. Pentafecta is a new and more comprehensive methodology to report outcomes after RP, including complications and surgical margin status with the three major outcomes classically reported. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) by applying the concept of pentafecta.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Describe the experience in this institution from March 2009 to December 2012 of RALRP by pentafecta.

RESULTS

We performed 101 interventions and obtained the following results: Average age 60.89 ± 7.32 years (40-77), total PSA 8.5 ± 5.57 ng/dl (0.2-29); D'Amico classification: Low 29 (28.71%), Medium 65 (64.36%), High 7 (6.93%); Operative time 253.44 ± 51.51 min (90-540), Complications 12.9% (Clavien I-II 10.89% and Clavien IIIa 1.98%); Positive surgical margins 20.83%; Biochemistry recurrence 12.5% follow-up (6-44 months); and Continence 87.5% per year and Potency 59.52%.

CONCLUSIONS

RALRP is a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent results in terms of pentafecta, inclusive during the initial experience at a low volumen center for prostate cancer. A longer follow-up study and experience with higher volume of patients are required to obtain better results and data to be compared with excellence centers.

摘要

目的

根治性前列腺切除术(RP)是长期控制癌症的标准治疗方法。微创手术和新技术的兴起取得了更好的效果,使我们能够追求更宏伟的目标。主要研究仍将“三连胜”作为经典指标,但这并未涵盖手术的所有方面。“五连胜”是一种更新的、更全面的方法,用于报告RP术后的结果,包括并发症和手术切缘状态以及传统报告的三大主要结果。本研究的目的是通过应用“五连胜”概念报告我们在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALRP)方面的经验。

材料与方法

描述2009年3月至2012年12月在本机构采用“五连胜”进行RALRP的经验。

结果

我们进行了101例手术,获得以下结果:平均年龄60.89±7.32岁(40 - 77岁),总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)8.5±5.57 ng/dl(0.2 - 29);达米科分类:低危29例(28.71%),中危65例(64.36%),高危7例(6.93%);手术时间253.44±51.51分钟(90 - 540分钟),并发症发生率12.9%(Clavien I - II级10.89%,Clavien IIIa级1.98%);手术切缘阳性率20.83%;生化复发率随访期间为12.5%(6 - 44个月);控尿率每年87.5%,勃起功能保留率59.52%。

结论

RALRP是一种安全且可重复的手术,在“五连胜”方面效果优异,包括在前列腺癌低手术量中心的初期经验。需要进行更长时间的随访研究以及更多患者的经验,以获得更好的结果和数据,与优秀中心进行比较。

相似文献

1
Pentafecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: first 100 cases in Latinoamerican Hospital.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的五项完美指标结果:拉丁美洲医院的前100例病例
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Jan-Feb;39(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
2
3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: a single cohort study.3D与2D腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:手术数据和五项指标达成率的比较:一项单队列研究
BMC Urol. 2015 Feb 21;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0006-9.
3
Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience.接受保留神经、机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者的风险组分布和 Pentafecta 结局趋势:10 年低中度容量单中心经验。
World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03206-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
4
Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.五边形:用于报告机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术结果的新概念。
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
5
Outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Pentafecta and Trifecta achievements.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后的结果:五项指标完美和三项指标完美达成情况。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Feb;70(1):66-73. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02909-5. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
6
Critical review of 'pentafecta' outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术在高容量中心的“五重奏”结局的批判性评价。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6 Pt 2):1007-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10521.x.
7
Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和控尿效果:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11279.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
8
Is previous experience in laparoscopic necessary to perform robotic radical prostatectomy? A comparative study with robotic and the classic open procedure in patients with prostate cancer.进行机器人根治性前列腺切除术是否需要有腹腔镜手术的既往经验?一项针对前列腺癌患者的机器人手术与传统开放手术的对比研究。
Acta Cir Bras. 2015 Mar;30(3):229-34. doi: 10.1590/S0102-8650201500300000011.
9
Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.经腹腔与腹膜外机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项前瞻性单术者随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2015 Oct;22(10):916-21. doi: 10.1111/iju.12854. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
10
Pentafecta Outcomes of 230 Cases of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Bilateral Neurovascular Bundle Preservation.230例保留双侧神经血管束的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的五项完美结局
Anticancer Res. 2015 Sep;35(9):5007-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy-a Contemporary Review.微创根治性前列腺切除术的结果——当代综述
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):580-588. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01125-3. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
2
Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in high prostate volume cases: impact on oncological and functional results.高前列腺体积病例中腹腔镜与开放根治性前列腺切除术的比较:对肿瘤学和功能结果的影响。
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):223-33. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0385.