• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受保留神经、机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者的风险组分布和 Pentafecta 结局趋势:10 年低中度容量单中心经验。

Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03206-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03206-y
PMID:32328779
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing (NS), robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a single low-intermediate volume prostate cancer (PCa) center over a 10-year period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried a prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent NS RARP between 2009 and 2018 in a low-intermediate volume PCa center. Risk-groups were defined according to the D'Amico classification. Pentafecta outcomes referred to the postsurgical presence of potency and continence, and the absence of biochemical recurrence (BCR), positive surgical margins (PSM), and perioperative complications. The Kruskall-Wallis test, the t test and the Mann-Whitney tests were used when appropriate.

RESULTS

603 patients underwent NS RARP and 484 patients were evaluated for Pentafecta outcomes. Median postsurgical follow-up was 28 months. Overall, 137 (22.7%), 376 (62.3%), and 90 (15%) patients were diagnosed in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Patients undergoing NS RARP shifted from 33 to 20% in the low-risk group, from 52 to 62% in the intermediate-risk group, and from 10 to 13% in the high-risk group. Patients reaching Pentafecta increased from 38 to 44%. No postoperative potency was the main reason for non-achieving Pentafecta (71%). BCR strongly limited Pentafecta achievement in the high-risk group (61%), but not in intermediate (24%) and low-risk (30%) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-intermediate volume PCa centers show similar trends to high-volume centers regarding risk group distributions over time in PCa patients undergoing NS RARP. We reported an increase in Pentafecta outcomes achievement over time even for experienced surgeons. Pentafecta outcomes achievement is risk-group dependent.

摘要

目的

在一个低容量前列腺癌(PCa)中心,评估 10 年间接受神经保留(NS)机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)治疗的患者的风险组分布和 Pentafecta 结果的趋势。

材料和方法

我们在一个低容量 PCa 中心查询了 2009 年至 2018 年间接受 NS RARP 的患者的前瞻性数据库。风险组根据 D'Amico 分类定义。Pentafecta 结果指手术后存在勃起功能和尿控,并且没有生化复发(BCR)、阳性手术切缘(PSM)和围手术期并发症。适当的时候使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验、t 检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验。

结果

603 例患者接受 NS RARP,484 例患者评估 Pentafecta 结果。中位术后随访时间为 28 个月。总体而言,137(22.7%)、376(62.3%)和 90(15%)例患者分别诊断为低危、中危和高危组。接受 NS RARP 的患者在低危组从 33%降至 20%,在中危组从 52%增至 62%,在高危组从 10%降至 13%。达到 Pentafecta 的患者从 38%增加到 44%。无法获得术后勃起功能是无法达到 Pentafecta 的主要原因(71%)。BCR 强烈限制了高危组(61%)的 Pentafecta 获得,但在中危组(24%)和低危组(30%)中则不然。

结论

低容量 PCa 中心在接受 NS RARP 治疗的 PCa 患者中,随着时间的推移,风险组分布与高容量中心类似。我们报告说,即使是经验丰富的外科医生,Pentafecta 结果的获得也在随着时间的推移而增加。Pentafecta 结果的获得与风险组有关。

相似文献

1
Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience.接受保留神经、机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者的风险组分布和 Pentafecta 结局趋势:10 年低中度容量单中心经验。
World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03206-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
3
Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study.在倾向评分匹配研究中比较保留神经和不保留神经的机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术的五因素结局。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 22;13(1):15835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43092-z.
4
Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留背静脉复合体的神经血管束逆行释放:优化功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
5
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
6
RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques.高危前列腺癌的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:多参数磁共振成像和保留神经技术的应用
Asian J Androl. 2014 Sep-Oct;16(5):715-9. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.129942.
7
Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-Year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的膀胱颈缝合和筋膜内神经保留与控尿及勃起功能恢复:手术可行性、一年性功能和肿瘤学结果。
Urol J. 2020 Jul 21;18(3):314-321. doi: 10.22037/uj.v16i7.5915.
8
Outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Pentafecta and Trifecta achievements.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后的结果:五项指标完美和三项指标完美达成情况。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Feb;70(1):66-73. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02909-5. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
9
Two-year quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy according to pentafecta criteria and cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA-S).根据 pentafecta 标准和前列腺癌风险评估 (CAPRA-S),机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术两年后的生活质量。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04289-2.
10
Pentafecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: first 100 cases in Latinoamerican Hospital.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的五项完美指标结果:拉丁美洲医院的前100例病例
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Jan-Feb;39(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing times: trends in risk classification, tumor upstaging, and positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy - results from a contemporary National Cancer Database study.时代变迁:根治性前列腺切除术后风险分类、肿瘤升级和阳性切缘的趋势——来自当代国家癌症数据库研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2024 Sep 30;42(1):551. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05262-0.
2
Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study.在倾向评分匹配研究中比较保留神经和不保留神经的机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术的五因素结局。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 22;13(1):15835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43092-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Pentafecta and Trifecta achievements.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后的结果:五项指标完美和三项指标完美达成情况。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Feb;70(1):66-73. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02909-5. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
Changing nationwide trends away from overtreatment among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy over the past 25 years.
过去 25 年来,全国范围内接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者过度治疗的趋势正在发生变化。
World J Urol. 2023 Jun;41(6):1497-1502. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04418-8. Epub 2023 May 17.
4
Nerve-sparing Robot-assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: The Monoblock Technique.保留神经的机器人辅助腹膜后淋巴结清扫术:整块切除技术
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Aug 15;32:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.07.004. eCollection 2021 Oct.