• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肋间胸腔引流管放置不当继发的内脏损伤谱:来自南非一家高容量创伤中心的经验

The spectrum of visceral injuries secondary to misplaced intercostal chest drains: experience from a high volume trauma service in South Africa.

作者信息

Kong Victor Y, Clarke Damian L

机构信息

Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3216, South Africa.

出版信息

Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2014.05.013
PMID:24974160
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Iatrogenic visceral injuries (IVI) secondary to the insertion of an intercostal chest drain (ICD) are well documented, but are usually confined to case reports and small series.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our experience with 53 consecutive patients over a insertion seven year period who sustained an IVI secondary to an ICD and describe the spectrum of injuries and clinical outcome in a high volume trauma service in South Africa.

RESULTS

A total of 53 ICDs were inserted in 53 patients, 83% (44/53) of which were on the left side, and 17% (9/53) on the right side. 92% (49/53) of the patients were males and the mean age for all patients was 24 (±8) years. 85% of the patients were referred from rural hospitals, the remaining 15% were treated initially at our institution. A trocar was used in 75% (40/53) of patients and in 9% (5/53), a trocar was not used, 58 organ injuries occurred in 53 patients. 92% (49/53) of patients sustained a single organ injury and 4 sustained multiple injuries. The three most common injuries were: diaphragm (36%, 21/53), gastric (22%, 13/53), and pulmonary (12%, 7/53). Other injuries were: 6 (10%) spleen, 4 (7%) liver, 2 (3%) colon and 1 (2%) kidney. Three (5%) sustained an injury to the intercostal artery and one (2%) sustained a pulmonary artery injury. 39 patients (74%) required operative interventions which included laparoscopy: 20 (51%), laparotomy: 8 (21%), thoracotomy: 8 (21%), VAT: 3 (8%). A total of 28 patients (53%) developed further complications: 13 wound sepsis, 7 pneumonia, 6 empyema, 2 ARDS. and 15% (8/53) required intensive care admission. The mean length of hospital stay was 7 (±4) days.

CONCLUSIONS

IVI is associated with significant morbidity, with diaphragmatic, gastric and pulmonary injuries being the most common. The majority were inserted in the rural hospitals and were associated with use of a trochar, Level of evidence: III, Study type: Retrospective study.

摘要

引言

肋间胸腔引流管(ICD)置入继发的医源性内脏损伤(IVI)已有充分记录,但通常局限于病例报告和小样本系列研究。

材料与方法

我们回顾了连续7年期间53例因ICD置入继发IVI患者的情况,并描述了南非一家大型创伤中心的损伤谱及临床结果。

结果

53例患者共置入53根ICD,其中83%(44/53)在左侧,17%(9/53)在右侧。92%(49/53)的患者为男性,所有患者的平均年龄为24(±8)岁。85%的患者由农村医院转诊而来,其余15%最初在我院接受治疗。75%(40/53)的患者使用了套管针,9%(5/53)未使用套管针,53例患者共发生58处器官损伤。92%(49/53)的患者为单器官损伤,4例为多器官损伤。最常见的三种损伤为:膈肌损伤(36%,21/53)、胃损伤(22%,13/53)和肺损伤(12%,7/53)。其他损伤包括:脾损伤6例(10%)、肝损伤4例(7%)、结肠损伤2例(3%)和肾损伤1例(2%)。3例(5%)发生肋间动脉损伤,1例(2%)发生肺动脉损伤。39例(74%)患者需要手术干预,包括腹腔镜手术:20例(51%)、剖腹手术:8例(21%)、开胸手术:8例(21%)、胸腔镜辅助手术:3例(8%)。共有28例(53%)患者出现进一步并发症:13例伤口感染、7例肺炎、6例脓胸、2例急性呼吸窘迫综合征。15%(8/5)的患者需要入住重症监护病房。平均住院时间为7(±4)天。

结论

IVI与显著的发病率相关,膈肌、胃和肺损伤最为常见。大多数ICD在农村医院置入,且与套管针的使用有关。证据级别:III,研究类型:回顾性研究。

相似文献

1
The spectrum of visceral injuries secondary to misplaced intercostal chest drains: experience from a high volume trauma service in South Africa.肋间胸腔引流管放置不当继发的内脏损伤谱:来自南非一家高容量创伤中心的经验
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 May 21.
2
An audit of the complications of intercostal chest drain insertion in a high volume trauma service in South Africa.南非一家高容量创伤治疗机构的肋间胸腔引流管插入术并发症审计。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Nov;96(8):609-13. doi: 10.1308/003588414X14055925058599.
3
Iatrogenic lung injury on radiological evidence: is it always wise to blindly follow the image?
Injury. 2014 Dec;45(12):2117-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.022. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
4
Complications of tube thoracostomy for chest trauma.胸部创伤行胸腔闭式引流术的并发症。
S Afr Med J. 2009 Feb;99(2):114-7.
5
Prevalence, management and outcome of traumatic diaphragm injuries managed by the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service.彼得马里茨堡市创伤服务中心处理的创伤性膈肌损伤的患病率、管理及结果
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 May;99(5):394-401. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0029.
6
An audit of failed non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds.腹部锐器伤非手术治疗失败的审核。
Injury. 2010 May;41(5):488-91. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.022. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
7
Emergency operation for penetrating thoracic trauma in a metropolitan surgical service in South Africa.南非大都市外科服务中穿透性胸部创伤的急诊手术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Sep;142(3):563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.03.034.
8
Laparoscopic repair of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries.腹腔镜修复创伤性膈肌损伤
Surg Endosc. 2003 Feb;17(2):254-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8831-9. Epub 2002 Oct 29.
9
Evolution in the management of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries: a multicenter review.创伤性横膈膜损伤的治疗演变:一项多中心回顾。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Apr;76(4):1024-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000140.
10
Laparoscopy in the evaluation of penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma.腹腔镜检查在穿透性胸腹联合伤评估中的应用
Am Surg. 2003 Sep;69(9):788-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Trauma and Intensive Care (ERATIC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society and International Association of Trauma Surgery and Intensive Care (IATSIC) Recommendations: Paper 1: Initial Care-Pre and Intraoperative Care Until ICU, Including Non-Operative Management.创伤与重症监护后强化康复指南(ERATIC):外科手术后强化康复(ERAS)学会与国际创伤外科与重症监护协会(IATSIC)推荐意见:第1篇:初始治疗——直至重症监护病房的术前及术中治疗,包括非手术治疗。
World J Surg. 2025 Aug;49(8):1997-2028. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70002. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
2
Thoracostomy tube withdrawal during latter phases of expiration or inspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.呼气末或吸气末时行胸腔引流管拔除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2389-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02306-9. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
An observational simulation-based study of the accuracy of intercostal drain placement and factors influencing placement.一项基于观察性模拟的肋间引流管放置准确性及影响放置因素的研究。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec;12(4):473-477. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
An Analysis of Patients who Underwent Tube Thoracostomy in the Emergency Department: A Single Center Study.急诊科行胸腔闭式引流术患者的分析:一项单中心研究
Turk Thorac J. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):25-29. doi: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2018.18056.
5
External Validation of a Tube Thoracostomy Complication Classification System.胸腔闭式引流并发症分类系统的外部验证
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):736-741. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4260-8.
6
Iatrogenic splenic injury: review of the literature and medico-legal issues.医源性脾损伤:文献综述与法医学问题
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Aug 2;11(1):307-315. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0059. eCollection 2016.
7
Visually guided tube thoracostomy insertion comparison to standard of care in a large animal model.在大型动物模型中,视觉引导下胸腔闭式引流管插入术与标准治疗的比较。
Injury. 2017 Apr;48(4):849-853. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 20.