Suppr超能文献

呼气末或吸气末时行胸腔引流管拔除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Thoracostomy tube withdrawal during latter phases of expiration or inspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2389-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02306-9. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In patients with thoracic injuries, tube thoracostomy is routinely employed. There is disagreement over which manner of tube withdrawal is best, the latter phases of expiration or inspiration. Considering several earlier investigations' inconsistent findings, their comparative effectiveness is still up for debate. In light of this, we carried out a systematic analysis of studies contrasting the withdrawal of thoracostomy tubes during the latter stages of expiration versus inspiration for traumatic chest injuries. Analyzed outcomes are recurrent pneumothoraces, reinsertion of the thoracostomy tube, and hospital stay.

METHODS

We looked for papers comparing the withdrawal of the thoracostomy tube during the last stages of expiration and inspiration for the management of thoracic injuries on Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Review Manager was used to determine mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) using a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The primary outcomes showed no significant difference between the inspiration and expiration groups: recurrent pneumothorax (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.83-1.93, P 0.28) and thoracostomy tube reinsertion (OR: 1.84, CI 0.50-6.86, P 0.36, I 5%). However, the duration of hospital stay was significantly lower in patients in whom the thoracostomy tube was removed at the end of inspiration (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.49-2.11, P < 0.00001, I 0%). The implications of these findings warrant cautious interpretation, accounting for potential confounding factors and inherent limitations that may shape their significance.

CONCLUSION

The thoracostomy tube can be removed during both the end-expiratory and end-inspiratory stages of respiration with no appreciable difference. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised when ascertaining the implications of these findings, taking into account the potential limitations and confounding variables that may exert influence upon the outcomes.

摘要

目的

在胸部损伤患者中,常规使用胸腔引流管。对于哪种拔管方式最佳,是呼气末还是吸气末,存在争议。考虑到之前几项研究的结果不一致,它们的比较效果仍存在争议。有鉴于此,我们对比较外伤性胸部损伤时在呼气末和吸气末阶段拔管的胸腔引流管的研究进行了系统分析。分析的结果是复发性气胸、再次插入胸腔引流管和住院时间。

方法

我们在 Embase、Pubmed、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 上检索比较胸腔引流管在呼气末和吸气末管理胸部损伤的研究。使用 Review Manager 确定均数差(MD)和风险比(RR),置信区间(CI)为 95%。

结果

主要结果显示,在呼气组和吸气组之间没有显著差异:复发性气胸(RR 1.27,95%CI 0.83-1.93,P 0.28)和再次插入胸腔引流管(OR:1.84,CI 0.50-6.86,P 0.36,I 5%)。然而,在吸气末拔出胸腔引流管的患者中,住院时间明显缩短(RR 1.8,95%CI 1.49-2.11,P < 0.00001,I 0%)。这些发现的意义需要谨慎解释,要考虑到可能影响其意义的潜在混杂因素和固有局限性。

结论

胸腔引流管可以在呼吸的呼气末和吸气末阶段拔出,没有明显差异。然而,在确定这些发现的意义时,应谨慎行事,同时考虑到可能对结果产生影响的潜在局限性和混杂因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验