McQueen H A, Shields C, Finnegan D J, Higham J, Simmen M W
Institute of cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, United Kingdom.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;42(5):371-81. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20806. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
We demonstrate that student engagement with PeerWise, an online tool that allows students to author and answer multiple-choice questions (MCQs), is associated with enhanced academic performance across diverse assessment types on a second year Genetics course. Benefits were consistent over three course deliveries, with differential benefits bestowed on groups of different prior ability. A rating scheme, to assess the educational quality of students' questions, is presented and demonstrates that our students are able intuitively to make such quality assessments, and that the process of authoring high quality questions alone does not explain the academic benefits. We further test the benefits of providing additional PeerWise support and conclude that PeerWise works efficiently with minimal intervention, and can be reliably assessed using automatically generated PeerWise scores.
我们证明,学生参与PeerWise(一种允许学生编写和回答多项选择题的在线工具)与二年级遗传学课程中各种评估类型的学业成绩提高相关。在三次课程授课中,益处都是一致的,不同先前能力的学生群体获得了不同的益处。我们提出了一种评分方案,用于评估学生问题的教育质量,并证明我们的学生能够直观地进行此类质量评估,而且仅编写高质量问题的过程并不能解释学业上的益处。我们进一步测试了提供额外PeerWise支持的益处,并得出结论,PeerWise在最少干预的情况下就能高效运行,并且可以使用自动生成的PeerWise分数进行可靠评估。