• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在共同创建的形成性考试题库中回答问题可以提高总结性考试成绩,而学生从回答、创作和同伴讨论中受益:PeerWise 的混合方法分析。

Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.

机构信息

Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021 Aug;9(4):e00833. doi: 10.1002/prp2.833.

DOI:10.1002/prp2.833
PMID:34309243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8311910/
Abstract

Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are a common form of assessment in medical schools and students seek opportunities to engage with formative assessment that reflects their summative exams. Formative assessment with feedback and active learning strategies improve student learning outcomes, but a challenge for educators, particularly those with large class sizes, is how to provide students with such opportunities without overburdening faculty. To address this, we enrolled medical students in the online learning platform PeerWise, which enables students to author and answer MCQs, rate the quality of other students' contributions as well as discuss content. A quasi-experimental mixed methods research design was used to explore PeerWise use and its impact on the learning experience and exam results of fourth year medical students who were studying courses in clinical sciences and pharmacology. Most students chose to engage with PeerWise following its introduction as a noncompulsory learning opportunity. While students perceived benefits in authoring and peer discussion, students engaged most highly with answering questions, noting that this helped them identify gaps in knowledge, test their learning and improve exam technique. Detailed analysis of the 2015 cohort (n = 444) with hierarchical regression models revealed a significant positive predictive relationship between answering PeerWise questions and exam results, even after controlling for previous academic performance, which was further confirmed with a follow-up multi-year analysis (2015-2018, n = 1693). These 4 years of quantitative data corroborated students' belief in the benefit of answering peer-authored questions for learning.

摘要

选择题(MCQs)是医学院中常见的评估形式,学生寻求机会参与反映他们总结考试的形成性评估。带有反馈和主动学习策略的形成性评估可以提高学生的学习成果,但对于教育工作者来说,尤其是对于班级规模较大的教育工作者来说,挑战在于如何在不增加教师负担的情况下为学生提供这种机会。为了解决这个问题,我们让医学生在在线学习平台 PeerWise 上注册,该平台使学生能够编写和回答 MCQs、对其他学生的贡献质量进行评分以及讨论内容。采用准实验混合方法研究设计来探索 PeerWise 的使用及其对第四年学习临床科学和药理学课程的医学生学习经验和考试成绩的影响。大多数学生选择在介绍 PeerWise 作为非强制性学习机会后参与其中。虽然学生在编写和同伴讨论中感知到了好处,但学生最热衷于回答问题,他们指出这有助于他们发现知识差距、检验他们的学习并提高考试技巧。对 2015 年队列(n=444)的详细分析(n=444)使用层次回归模型显示,在控制以前的学业成绩后,回答 PeerWise 问题与考试成绩之间存在显著的正相关关系,这一结果在随后的多年分析(2015-2018 年,n=1693)中得到了进一步证实。这些 4 年的定量数据证实了学生对回答同伴编写的问题对学习有益的信念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2635/8311910/2ce3011491b4/PRP2-9-e00833-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2635/8311910/35850acfc08e/PRP2-9-e00833-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2635/8311910/2ce3011491b4/PRP2-9-e00833-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2635/8311910/35850acfc08e/PRP2-9-e00833-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2635/8311910/2ce3011491b4/PRP2-9-e00833-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.在共同创建的形成性考试题库中回答问题可以提高总结性考试成绩,而学生从回答、创作和同伴讨论中受益:PeerWise 的混合方法分析。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021 Aug;9(4):e00833. doi: 10.1002/prp2.833.
2
Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.形成性学生自主命题题库:认知、问题质量与总结性表现的关联。
Postgrad Med J. 2018 Feb;94(1108):97-103. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135018. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
3
Embedding retrieval practice in undergraduate biochemistry teaching using PeerWise.在本科生物化学教学中使用 PeerWise 嵌入嵌入式检索实践。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2024 Mar-Apr;52(2):156-164. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21799. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
4
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
5
Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.医学生在病理学教育中创建多选题进行学习:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1312-1.
6
Student generation and peer review of examination questions in the dental curriculum: Enhancing student engagement and learning.学生生成和同行评审在牙科课程中的考试问题:提高学生参与度和学习效果。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2020 Aug;24(3):548-558. doi: 10.1111/eje.12536. Epub 2020 May 18.
7
PeerWise provides significant academic benefits to biological science students across diverse learning tasks, but with minimal instructor intervention.PeerWise为生物科学专业的学生在各种学习任务中提供了显著的学术益处,而且教师的干预最少。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;42(5):371-81. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20806. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
8
PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.同伴互评与病理学:终止一项未发挥其潜力的教学创新。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Oct 14;9:27. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000027.2. eCollection 2020.
9
Medical school 2.0: How we developed a student-generated question bank using small group learning.医学院2.0:我们如何通过小组学习开发学生自主生成的题库。
Med Teach. 2015;37(10):892-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.970624. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
A participatory learning approach to biochemistry using student authored and evaluated multiple-choice questions.一种使用学生自主编写和评估的多项选择题进行生物化学学习的参与式方法。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2011 Sep-Oct;39(5):352-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20526.

引用本文的文献

1
A Picture Paints a Thousand Words: Perspectives of the Use of Images and Videos of Physical Findings in Virtual OSCE Teaching Sessions.一图胜千言:虚拟客观结构化临床考试教学环节中体格检查图像和视频使用的视角
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Oct 1;15:909-920. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S463374. eCollection 2024.
2
Question banks: credit? Or debit? A qualitative exploration of their use among medical students.题库:信用?还是负债?对医学生使用题库的定性探索。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 24;24(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05517-9.

本文引用的文献

1
PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.同伴互评与病理学:终止一项未发挥其潜力的教学创新。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Oct 14;9:27. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000027.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessment as Learning in Medical Education: Feasibility and Perceived Impact of Student-Generated Formative Assessments.医学教育中的以评促学:学生自主形成性评估的可行性及感知影响
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Jul 22;8(3):e35820. doi: 10.2196/35820.
3
Student-Written Multiple-Choice Questions-a Practical and Educational Approach.
学生编写的多项选择题——一种实用且具教育意义的方法。
Med Sci Educ. 2018 Nov 6;29(1):41-43. doi: 10.1007/s40670-018-00646-5. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
Comment on: creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.对《将评估作为一种主动学习策略:学生有何看法?一项混合方法研究》的评论
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1709277. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1709277.
5
Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.创建评估作为一种主动学习策略:学生的看法是什么?一项混合方法研究。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1630239. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1630239.
6
Medical students: what educational resources are they using?医学生:他们在使用哪些教育资源?
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9.
7
Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.医学生在病理学教育中创建多选题进行学习:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1312-1.
8
Crowdsourcing for assessment items to support adaptive learning.众包评估项目以支持自适应学习。
Med Teach. 2018 Aug;40(8):838-841. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1490704. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Improving large class performance and engagement through student-generated question banks.通过学生生成的题库提高大班教学的表现和参与度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2018 Jul;46(4):306-317. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21119. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Assessing a traditional case-based application exercise and a student question creation exercise on student performance and perceptions.评估一个基于案例的传统应用练习以及一个学生问题创建练习对学生表现和认知的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):689-697. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 May 31.