Harris Benjamin H L, Walsh Jason L, Tayyaba Saadia, Harris David A, Wilson David J, Smith Phil E
a Cardiff University School of Medicine , Cardiff , Wales , UK.
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are the main method of assessing medical student knowledge. As a result there is a high demand from medical students for formative MCQs. However, teaching staff rarely have the time or incentive to develop high-quality formative questions, focusing instead on material for high-stakes assessments.
We have developed a novel student-led approach involving an interactive online question database, created by medical students for medical students. We adopted a staged approach to create an online bank of formative MCQ questions. First, students write MCQs following a standardized format. Questions are then peer-reviewed by other students, discussing relevant clinical topics, guidelines, and journals to improve question quality. The questions are then scrutinized by specialist doctors and academics. Next, questions are piloted online. Finally, question performance is evaluated statistically. This 5-stage student-led process produced a bank of more than 200 MCQs in three months.
This intervention was carried out by two final-year medical student leads at Cardiff University School of Medicine, UK. Final-year students were recruited to write and peer-review questions, and senior content specialists were recruited from the department. After piloting and evaluation of the questions, the question bank was made available as a learning resource to all medical students at Cardiff University.
Objective analysis of the created MCQs (discrimination indices and distractor analysis) indicated that the random sample of questions piloted were of high quality. When the questions were made available as online tests to approximately 600 students, usage data revealed that 2,800 tests were taken over a 3-month period, indicating that the resource was popular. In addition, subjective feedback from students question writers/reviewers was gathered via free text feedback forms and was invariably positive. We plan to continue the question generation process in Cardiff and would encourage other medical schools to adopt this approach.
Our 5-stage approach can generate a large volume of high-quality MCQs, addressing the demand from students for formative MCQ questions, with minimal teaching staff input. The project's benefits go beyond the creation of the resource, as involving students in the writing, review, and presentation of questions itself is useful pedagogically.
多项选择题(MCQs)是评估医学生知识的主要方式。因此,医学生对形成性多项选择题有很高的需求。然而,教师很少有时间或动力去编写高质量的形成性问题,而是将精力集中在高风险评估的材料上。
我们开发了一种全新的学生主导方法,其中包括一个由医学生为医学生创建的交互式在线问题数据库。我们采用分阶段方法创建一个形成性多项选择题的在线题库。首先,学生按照标准化格式编写多项选择题。然后由其他学生进行同行评审,讨论相关临床主题、指南和期刊以提高问题质量。接着由专科医生和学者对问题进行审查。之后,问题在网上进行试用。最后,对问题的表现进行统计评估。这个由学生主导的五阶段过程在三个月内产生了一个包含200多个多项选择题的题库。
这项干预措施由英国卡迪夫大学医学院的两名医学专业最后一年的学生牵头实施。招募了医学专业最后一年的学生来编写和同行评审问题,并从该系招募了资深内容专家。在对问题进行试用和评估后,该题库作为学习资源提供给卡迪夫大学的所有医学生。
对所创建的多项选择题进行客观分析(区分指数和干扰项分析)表明,试用的随机抽样问题质量很高。当这些问题作为在线测试提供给大约600名学生时,使用数据显示在三个月内进行了2800次测试,表明该资源很受欢迎。此外,通过自由文本反馈表收集了学生问题编写者/评审者的主观反馈,反馈结果一直是积极的。我们计划在卡迪夫继续问题生成过程,并鼓励其他医学院采用这种方法。
我们的五阶段方法能够以最少的教师投入生成大量高质量的多项选择题,满足学生对形成性多项选择题的需求。该项目的好处不仅在于创建了资源,因为让学生参与问题的编写、评审和展示本身在教学上是有益的。