Kim Min-Hye, Song Woo-Jung, Kim Tae-Wan, Jin Hyun-Jung, Sin You-Seob, Ye Young-Min, Kim Sang-Heon, Park Heung-Woo, Lee Byung-Jae, Park Hae-Sim, Yoon Ho-Joo, Choi Dong-Chull, Min Kyung-Up, Cho Sang-Heon
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Respirology. 2014 Aug;19(6):852-6. doi: 10.1111/resp.12334. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
Airway hyperresponsiveness is a common feature of asthma. Methacholine and mannitol are two representative agonists for bronchial challenge. They have theoretically different mechanisms of action, and may have different diagnostic properties. However, their difference has not been directly evaluated among Korean adults. In this study, we compare the diagnostic properties of methacholine and mannitol bronchial provocation tests.
Asthmatic patients and non-asthmatic controls were recruited prospectively from four referral hospitals in Korea. Participants were challenged with each of methacholine and mannitol inhalation on different days. Their diagnostic utility was evaluated by calculating their sensitivity and specificity for asthma diagnosis. Response-dose ratio was also compared.
A total of 50 asthmatic adults and 54 controls were enrolled (mean age 43.8 years). The sensitivity and specificity of mannitol challenge (defined by a PD15 of <635 mg) were 48.0% and 92.6%, respectively, whereas those of methacholine (defined by a PC20 of <16 mg/mL) were 42.0% and 98.1%, respectively. Twenty asthmatic participants (24%) showed positive response to a single agonist only. In the receiver operating curve analyses using response-dose ratio values, area under the curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.86) for mannitol, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95) for methacholine. The correlations between log- transformed mannitol and methacholine response-dose ratios were significant but moderate (r = 0.683, P < 0.001).
The present study demonstrated overall similar diagnostic properties of two diagnostic tests, but also suggested their intercomplementary roles for asthma. The clinical trial registration number at ClinicalTrial.gov is NCT02104284.
气道高反应性是哮喘的一个常见特征。乙酰甲胆碱和甘露醇是支气管激发试验的两种代表性激动剂。它们在理论上具有不同的作用机制,可能具有不同的诊断特性。然而,在韩国成年人中尚未对它们的差异进行直接评估。在本研究中,我们比较了乙酰甲胆碱和甘露醇支气管激发试验的诊断特性。
前瞻性地从韩国四家转诊医院招募哮喘患者和非哮喘对照者。参与者在不同日期分别接受乙酰甲胆碱和甘露醇吸入激发试验。通过计算它们对哮喘诊断的敏感性和特异性来评估其诊断效用。还比较了反应剂量比。
共纳入50名成年哮喘患者和54名对照者(平均年龄43.8岁)。甘露醇激发试验(定义为PD15<635mg)的敏感性和特异性分别为48.0%和92.6%,而乙酰甲胆碱激发试验(定义为PC20<16mg/mL)的敏感性和特异性分别为42.0%和98.1%。20名哮喘参与者(24%)仅对单一激动剂呈阳性反应。在使用反应剂量比值的受试者工作曲线分析中,甘露醇的曲线下面积为0.77(95%置信区间(CI):0.68 - 0.86),乙酰甲胆碱的曲线下面积为0.89(95%CI:0.83 - 0.95)。对数转换后的甘露醇和乙酰甲胆碱反应剂量比之间的相关性显著但中等(r = 0.683,P < 0.001)。
本研究表明两种诊断试验的总体诊断特性相似,但也提示它们在哮喘诊断中具有相互补充的作用。ClinicalTrial.gov上的临床试验注册号为NCT02104284。