Suppr超能文献

疑似遗传性血小板功能障碍的诊断:一项全球性调查结果。

Diagnosis of suspected inherited platelet function disorders: results of a worldwide survey.

机构信息

Division of Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Sep;12(9):1562-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.12650. Epub 2014 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of inherited platelet function disorders (IPFDs) is important for appropriate management and to improve epidemiologic and clinical knowledge. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the diagnostic approach.

OBJECTIVES

To gain knowledge on the current practices for the diagnosis of IPFD worldwide.

METHODS

A 67-item questionnaire was distributed to the ISTH members and to the members of several national hemostasis and thrombosis societies.

RESULTS

A total of 202 laboratories from 37 countries participated in the survey. The most frequent criterion to define patients with a suspected IPFD was a history of mucocutaneous bleeding and no acquired cause, but heterogeneity on the identification criteria was evident. Only 64.5% of respondents performed a direct clinical interview. On average, each laboratory studied 72 patients per year. The most commonly used laboratory equipment were the light-transmission aggregometer, the Platelet Function Analyzer-100, and the flow cytometer. Screening tests were platelet count, peripheral blood smear, light-transmission aggregometry, and Platelet Function Analyzer-100. Second-step tests were flow cytometry, molecular genetic analysis, and electron microscopy. Methodologies varied widely. In total, ~ 14,000 patients were investigated yearly and 60% turned out to not have a defect. Of the remaining 40%, only 8.7% received a diagnosis at a molecular level.

CONCLUSIONS

Many laboratories worldwide are involved in the diagnosis of IPFD. A large fraction of the patients studied remain without a diagnosis. A high variability in the diagnostic approaches is evident.

摘要

背景

遗传性血小板功能障碍(IPFD)的诊断对于适当的管理和提高流行病学和临床知识非常重要。然而,在诊断方法上仍然缺乏共识。

目的

了解全球诊断 IPFD 的当前实践情况。

方法

向 ISTH 成员和多个国家止血和血栓形成学会的成员分发了一份包含 67 个项目的问卷。

结果

来自 37 个国家的 202 个实验室参与了这项调查。最常用来定义疑似 IPFD 患者的标准是黏膜皮肤出血史且无获得性病因,但识别标准存在明显的异质性。只有 64.5%的受访者进行了直接临床访谈。平均而言,每个实验室每年研究 72 名患者。最常用的实验室设备是光传输聚集仪、血小板功能分析仪-100 和流式细胞仪。筛选试验包括血小板计数、外周血涂片、光传输聚集仪和血小板功能分析仪-100。第二步测试是流式细胞术、分子遗传学分析和电子显微镜检查。方法学差异很大。每年总共调查约 14000 名患者,其中 60%的患者没有缺陷。在其余的 40%中,只有 8.7%在分子水平上得到了诊断。

结论

全球许多实验室都参与了 IPFD 的诊断。研究中的很大一部分患者仍未得到诊断。诊断方法的高度变异性是显而易见的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验