Suppr超能文献

单中心比较电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开放性胸腺切除术治疗胸腺瘤的效果。

Comparative study of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thymectomy for thymoma in one single center.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jun;6(6):726-33. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.04.08.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to the popularity of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) techniques in clinical, thymoma patients via VATS thymectomy are increasing rapidly. However, compared with open thymectomy, the potential superiorities and defects of VATS thymectomy remain controversial.

METHODS

A number of 129 patients who underwent thymectomy of early stage thymoma (Masaoka stage I and stage II) in one single center from January 2007 to September 2013 were selected in this retrospective study. Of those patients, 38 thymoma patients underwent VATS thymectomy (VATS group) and 91 underwent open thymectomy (open group) via either transsternal [44] or transthoracic approach [47] in the same period. The postoperative variables, which included postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS), the intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, the entire resection ratio, the number of thoracic drainage tubes, the quantity of output and duration of drainage, were analyzed. Meanwhile, the operation time and blood loss were considered as intraoperative variables.

RESULTS

All thymoma patients in the analysis included 19 thymoma patients with myasthenia gravis, among which five patients via VATS thymectomy and 14 patients via open thymectomy respectively. There was no death or morbidity due to the surgical procedures perioperatively. The ICU LOS, operation time, entire resection ratio, and the number of chest tubes were not significantly different in two groups. The postoperative hospital LOS of VATS thymectomy was shorter than that of open thymectomy (5.26 versus 8.32 days, P<0.001). The blood loss of VATS thymectomy was less than open thymectomy (114.74 versus 194.51 mL, P=0.002). Postoperatively, the quantity of chest tubes output in VATS group was less than that in open thymectomy group (617.86 versus 850.08 mL, P=0.007) and duration of drainage in VATS group was shorter than that in open thymectomy group (3.87 versus 5.22 days, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

VATS thymectomy is a safe and practicable treatment for early-stage thymoma patients. Thymoma according with Masaoka staging I-II without evident invading seems to be performed through VATS approach appropriately, which has shorter postoperative hospital LOS, less blood loss and less restrictions to activities, hence patients will recover sooner.

摘要

背景

由于电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)技术在临床中的普及,通过 VATS 胸腺切除术治疗胸腺瘤的患者数量迅速增加。然而,与开胸胸腺切除术相比,VATS 胸腺切除术的潜在优势和缺陷仍存在争议。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2007 年 1 月至 2013 年 9 月期间在一家中心接受早期胸腺瘤(Masaoka Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期)胸腺切除术的 129 例患者。其中,38 例胸腺瘤患者接受了电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术(VATS 组),38 例患者接受了胸骨正中或经胸入路开胸胸腺切除术(开放组)。分析了术后变量,包括术后住院时间(LOS)、重症监护病房(ICU) LOS、全切除率、胸腔引流管数量、引流量和引流时间。同时,手术时间和出血量被认为是术中变量。

结果

所有纳入分析的胸腺瘤患者均包括 19 例重症肌无力患者,其中 5 例接受 VATS 胸腺切除术,14 例接受开放胸腺切除术。围手术期无手术相关死亡或并发症。两组患者 ICU LOS、手术时间、全切除率和胸腔引流管数量无显著差异。VATS 胸腺切除术组患者术后住院时间短于开放胸腺切除术组(5.26 天比 8.32 天,P<0.001)。VATS 胸腺切除术组患者出血量少于开放胸腺切除术组(114.74 毫升比 194.51 毫升,P=0.002)。术后,VATS 组患者胸腔引流管引流量少于开放胸腺切除术组(617.86 毫升比 850.08 毫升,P=0.007),引流时间短于开放胸腺切除术组(3.87 天比 5.22 天,P<0.001)。

结论

VATS 胸腺切除术是治疗早期胸腺瘤患者的一种安全可行的治疗方法。Masaoka 分期Ⅰ-Ⅱ期且无明显侵袭的胸腺瘤似乎可以通过 VATS 方法适当进行,术后住院时间更短,出血量更少,活动受限更小,患者恢复更快。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thymectomy for thymoma in one single center.
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jun;6(6):726-33. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.04.08.
2
Surgical techniques for early-stage thymoma: video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy versus transsternal thymectomy.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 May;147(5):1599-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.053. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
3
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical thymectomy to treat early thymoma: a comparison with the conventional transsternal approach.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):322-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3228-7. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
5
[Comparative analysis of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open resection for early-stage thymoma].
Cir Esp. 2015 Aug-Sep;93(7):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
Comparative study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thymectomy for thymoma and myasthenia gravis.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Sep;13(3):376-382. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.75835. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
[Comparative analysis of thoracoscopic and open thymectomy for thymoma stage I-II].
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2021(7):31-35. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202105131.
10
Comparison between thoracoscopic and open approaches in thymoma resection.
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Oct;11(10):4159-4168. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.09.85.

引用本文的文献

3
Long-term outcome in mediastinal malignancies: video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;37(1):44-52. doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-01023-x. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
7
Comparative study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thymectomy for thymoma and myasthenia gravis.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Sep;13(3):376-382. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.75835. Epub 2018 May 16.
9
10
Surgical and oncological outcomes of thoracoscopic thymectomy for thymoma.
J Vis Surg. 2017 Apr 10;3:54. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.03.18. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical thymectomy to treat early thymoma: a comparison with the conventional transsternal approach.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):322-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3228-7. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
2
Thymoma: current diagnosis and treatment.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(11):2186-91.
3
Preoperative CT findings of thymoma are correlated with postoperative Masaoka clinical stage.
Acad Radiol. 2013 Jan;20(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
4
Unilateral extended thoracoscopic thymectomy for nontumoral myasthenia gravis--a new standard.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Summer;24(2):115-22. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.06.003.
5
Minimally invasive thymectomy and open thymectomy: outcome analysis of 263 patients.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Sep;94(3):974-81; discussion 981-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.097. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
6
Comparison of surgical techniques for early-stage thymoma: feasibility of minimally invasive thymectomy and comparison with open resection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Mar;141(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.003. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
7
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or transsternal thymectomy in the treatment of myasthenia gravis?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Jan;12(1):40-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.251041. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
8
Evaluation and treatment of stage I and II thymoma.
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Oct;5(10 Suppl 4):S318-22. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f20dab.
9
Video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy: the better approach.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;89(6):S2135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.112.
10
Comparison of open and minimally invasive thymectomies at a single institution.
Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):589-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验