Amlang Michael H, Zwipp Hans, Friedrich Adina, Peaden Adam, Bunk Alfred, Rammelt Stefan
Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstra β e 74, 01309 Dresden, Germany.
Podiatric Medicine and Surgery Residency, Florida Hospital, East Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA.
ISRN Orthop. 2011 Oct 24;2011:869703. doi: 10.5402/2011/869703. eCollection 2011.
Purpose. This work introduces a distinct sonographic classification of Achilles tendon ruptures which has proven itself to be a reliable instrument for an individualized and differentiated therapy selection for patients who have suffered an Achilles tendon rupture. Materials and Methods. From January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2005, 273 patients who suffered from a complete subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon (ASR) were clinically and sonographically evaluated. The sonographic classification was organized according to the location of the rupture, the contact of the tendon ends, and the structure of the interposition between the tendon ends. Results. In 266 of 273 (97.4%) patients the sonographic classification of the rupture of the Achilles tendon was recorded. Type 1 was detected in 54 patients (19.8%), type 2a in 68 (24.9%), type 2b in 33 (12.1%), type 3a in 20 (7.3%), type 3b in 61 (22.3%), type 4 in 20 (7.3%), and type 5 in 10 (3.7%). Of the patients with type 1 and fresh ASR, 96% (n = 47) were treated nonoperative-functionally, and 4% (n = 2) were treated by percutaneous suture with the Dresden instrument (pDI suture). Of the patients classified as type 2a with fresh ASR, 31 patients (48%) were treated nonoperatively-functionally and 33 patients (52%) with percutaneous suture with the Dresden instrument (pDI suture). Of the patients with type 3b and fresh ASR, 94% (n = 34) were treated by pDI suture and 6% (n = 2) by open suture according to Kirchmayr and Kessler. Conclusion. Unlike the clinical classification of the Achilles tendon rupture, the sonographic classification is a guide for deriving a graded and differentiated therapy from a broad spectrum of treatments.
目的。本研究介绍了一种独特的跟腱断裂超声分类方法,该方法已被证明是为跟腱断裂患者选择个体化、差异化治疗的可靠工具。材料与方法。2000年1月1日至2005年12月31日,对273例跟腱完全皮下断裂(ASR)患者进行了临床和超声评估。超声分类根据断裂位置、肌腱断端接触情况以及肌腱断端间插入物的结构进行。结果。273例患者中有266例(97.4%)记录了跟腱断裂的超声分类。1型54例(19.8%),2a型68例(24.9%),2b型33例(12.1%),3a型20例(7.3%),3b型61例(22.3%),4型20例(7.3%),5型10例(3.7%)。1型和新鲜ASR患者中,96%(n = 47)采用非手术功能治疗,4%(n = 2)采用德累斯顿器械经皮缝合(pDI缝合)治疗。2a型新鲜ASR患者中,31例(48%)采用非手术功能治疗,33例(52%)采用德累斯顿器械经皮缝合(pDI缝合)治疗。3b型新鲜ASR患者中,94%(n = 34)采用pDI缝合治疗,6%(n = 2)采用Kirchmayr和Kessler开放缝合治疗。结论。与跟腱断裂的临床分类不同,超声分类是从广泛的治疗方法中得出分级、差异化治疗的指南。