• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用动态磁共振成像评价冲击波碎石术后急性肾损伤:一项前瞻性临床研究。

Evaluation of acute post-shock wave lithotripsy renal changes by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective clinical study.

机构信息

Departments of Urology and Radiology (MAE-G), Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Departments of Urology and Radiology (MAE-G), Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

J Urol. 2014 Dec;192(6):1705-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.074. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.074
PMID:24977320
Abstract

PURPOSE

We studied acute renal morphological and hemodynamic changes after shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 adult patients with a single renal stone 25 mm or less in a radiologically normal urinary tract were eligible for shock wave lithotripsy and included in analysis. Study exclusion criteria were hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous recent stone management and other contraindications to shock wave lithotripsy. Renal perfusion and morphological changes were evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging before, and 2 to 4 hours and 1 week after lithotripsy.

RESULTS

In all cases there was a statistically significant decrease in renal perfusion 1 week after shock wave lithotripsy compared to before and 2 to 4 hours after lithotripsy (66% vs 71% and 72% of the aortic blood flow, respectively, p <0.05). At 1-week followup 39 unobstructed renal units (65%) showed no significant difference in renal perfusion at any time while 21 (35%) obstructed renal units showed a significant decrease in renal perfusion compared to before and 2 to 4 hours after lithotripsy (63% vs 76% and 75%, p = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively). Hematomas were observed in 7 cases (12%) 2 to 4 hours after lithotripsy, of which 5 were subcapsular and 2 were intrarenal. Three subcapsular hematomas resolved after 1 week. Localized loss of corticomedullary differentiation was observed in 2 patients (3.3%) with intrarenal hematoma 2 to 4 hours after treatment. Generalized loss of corticomedullary differentiation was observed 1 week after lithotripsy in 5 cases (8.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Shock wave lithotripsy alone induces minimal, reversible acute renal morphological changes and does not induce significant changes in renal perfusion. Posttreatment obstruction has a major effect on renal perfusion on the treated side and must be managed urgently.

摘要

目的

我们研究了冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石后急性肾形态和血流动力学的变化。

材料和方法

共纳入 60 例成人患者,其单一肾结石大小为 25mm 或以下且尿路影像学正常,符合冲击波碎石术条件并纳入分析。研究排除标准为高血压、糖尿病、近期结石治疗史及其他冲击波碎石术禁忌证。通过动态磁共振成像评估碎石术前后 2 至 4 小时和 1 周时的肾灌注和形态变化。

结果

所有患者在冲击波碎石术后 1 周时肾灌注均显著低于碎石术前后 2 至 4 小时时(分别为主动脉血流的 66%、71%和 72%,p<0.05)。在 1 周随访时,39 个无梗阻的肾单位(65%)在任何时间的肾灌注均无显著差异,而 21 个(35%)梗阻的肾单位与碎石术前后 2 至 4 小时相比肾灌注显著降低(分别为 63%、76%和 75%,p=0.003 和 0.005)。7 例(12%)患者在碎石术后 2 至 4 小时出现血肿,其中 5 例为包膜下血肿,2 例为肾内血肿。3 例包膜下血肿在 1 周后消退。2 例治疗后 2 至 4 小时出现肾内血肿的患者观察到皮质髓质分界局部丧失,5 例患者在碎石术后 1 周时观察到皮质髓质分界普遍丧失。

结论

单纯冲击波碎石术可引起轻微、可逆的急性肾形态学变化,不会引起肾灌注的显著变化。治疗后梗阻对受影响侧肾灌注有重大影响,必须紧急处理。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of acute post-shock wave lithotripsy renal changes by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective clinical study.应用动态磁共振成像评价冲击波碎石术后急性肾损伤:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Urol. 2014 Dec;192(6):1705-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.074. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
2
A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute.一项冲击波单侧肾结石治疗效果的前瞻性、随机研究:每分钟 60 次与 120 次冲击。
J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):837-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
3
[The effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on kidney and adjacent tissue detected by magnetic resonance imaging].[磁共振成像检测体外冲击波碎石术对肾脏及邻近组织的影响]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1995 Aug;41(8):577-80.
4
Prospective study of the effects of shock wave lithotripsy on renal function: role of post-shock wave lithotripsy obstruction.冲击波碎石术对肾功能影响的前瞻性研究:冲击波碎石术后梗阻的作用
Urology. 2003 Jun;61(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00265-6.
5
Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.叶下珠会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效吗?一项随机、前瞻性长期研究。
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1020-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.010.
6
Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized study of effectiveness and safety in comparison to standard single-pulse technique.冲击波碎石术同步双脉冲技术的评估:与标准单脉冲技术相比的有效性和安全性前瞻性随机研究。
BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1420-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07357.x. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
7
Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.儿童肾结石的治疗:经皮肾镜取石术与冲击波碎石术的比较
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.080.
8
Shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones is not associated with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.肾结石的冲击波碎石术与高血压和糖尿病无关。
Urology. 2008 Apr;71(4):586-91; discussion 591-2. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.072.
9
A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.一种用于治疗尿路结石的新型便携式冲击波碎石机:双焦点碎石机的单中心经验
BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07039.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
10
[Clinical study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for 1000 patients with renal and ureteral stones].1000例肾及输尿管结石患者体外冲击波碎石术的临床研究
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1990 Aug;36(8):887-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of acetylsalicylic acid and low-molecular weight heparins on the formation of renal hematoma after shock wave lithotripsy.阿司匹林和低分子肝素对冲击波碎石术后肾血肿形成的影响。
World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1939-1946. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2070-0. Epub 2017 Jul 12.