• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击波碎石术同步双脉冲技术的评估:与标准单脉冲技术相比的有效性和安全性前瞻性随机研究。

Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized study of effectiveness and safety in comparison to standard single-pulse technique.

作者信息

Sheir Khaled Z, Elhalwagy Samer M, Abo-Elghar Mohamed E, Ismail Amani M, Elsawy Essam, El-Diasty Tarek A, Dawaba Mohamed E, Eraky Ibrahim A, El-Kenawy Mahmoud R

机构信息

Department of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1420-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07357.x. Epub 2007 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07357.x
PMID:18070192
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To asses the efficacy and safety of bidirectional synchronous twin-pulse extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) compared with standard ESWL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2003 and December 2006, 240 patients with a radio-opaque single renal stone of <or=25 mm were randomized to treatment either by the Twinheads (TH) lithotripter (FMD, Lorton, Virginia, USA) or the Dornier Lithotripter S (DLS, Dornier MedTech Europe GmbH, Germering, Germany). Before and after ESWL, urinary N-acetyl-B-glucosaminidase (NAG) levels were assessed and patients were evaluated with dynamic MRI. The efficacy and complications were compared, with success defined as no residual fragments.

RESULTS

For stones of >10 mm the rate for the failure of disintegration was 13.3% for the DLS vs 1.4% for the TH (P = 0.009). For stones of <or=10 mm the stone-free rate was 74.4% for the TH vs 67.7% for the DLS (P = 0.6), while for stones of >10 mm it was 78.1% and 66.7%, respectively (P = 0.14). The median (range) number of sessions in both groups was 2 (1-5). After ESWL urinary NAG levels were increased significantly in both groups; in the TH group it declined below the level before ESWL after 2 days, while in the DLS group it remained high after 7 days. In the DLS group four patients developed subcapsular or parenchymal haematoma after ESWL, vs none in the TH group. There was loss of corticomedullary differentiation after ESWL in three patients in the DLS group and only one in the TH group. In the DLS group there was a statistically significantly decrease in bilateral renal perfusion after ESWL, but no changes in the TH group.

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous twin-pulse ESWL has clinical advantages over standard ESWL in terms of safety and efficacy.

摘要

目的

评估双向同步双脉冲体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与标准ESWL相比的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

2003年3月至2006年12月期间,将240例不透X线的单个肾结石直径≤25mm的患者随机分为两组,分别采用双探头(TH)碎石机(美国弗吉尼亚州洛顿市FMD公司)或多尼尔碎石机S(DLS,德国盖默灵市多尼尔医疗技术欧洲有限公司)进行治疗。ESWL治疗前后,评估尿N-乙酰-β-葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)水平,并对患者进行动态磁共振成像(MRI)评估。比较疗效和并发症,成功定义为无残留碎片。

结果

对于直径>10mm的结石,DLS组的碎石失败率为13.3%,而TH组为1.4%(P = 0.009)。对于直径≤10mm的结石,TH组的结石清除率为74.4%,DLS组为67.7%(P = 0.6);对于直径>10mm的结石,两组的结石清除率分别为78.1%和66.7%(P = 0.14)。两组的中位(范围)治疗次数均为2次(1 - 5次)。ESWL治疗后,两组患者的尿NAG水平均显著升高;TH组在2天后降至ESWL治疗前水平以下,而DLS组在7天后仍保持较高水平。DLS组有4例患者在ESWL治疗后出现肾包膜下或实质内血肿,而TH组无此情况。DLS组有3例患者在ESWL治疗后出现肾皮质髓质分界消失,TH组仅有1例。DLS组在ESWL治疗后双侧肾灌注有统计学显著下降,而TH组无变化。

结论

同步双脉冲ESWL在安全性和疗效方面比标准ESWL具有临床优势。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized study of effectiveness and safety in comparison to standard single-pulse technique.冲击波碎石术同步双脉冲技术的评估:与标准单脉冲技术相比的有效性和安全性前瞻性随机研究。
BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1420-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07357.x. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
2
Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: the first prospective clinical study.冲击波碎石术同步双脉冲技术的评估:首例前瞻性临床研究。
BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(3):389-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05306.x.
3
A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.一种用于治疗尿路结石的新型便携式冲击波碎石机:双焦点碎石机的单中心经验
BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07039.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
4
Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison?使用第四代碎石机的治疗结果:一个新的比较基准?
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1356-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07117.x. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
5
Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后成功率的预测——一种多变量分析模型
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(2):161-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590310022626.
6
Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.叶下珠会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效吗?一项随机、前瞻性长期研究。
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1020-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.010.
7
Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.使用第三代体外冲击波碎石机的治疗效果和结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):972-81. doi: 10.1111/bju.12159.
8
Tamsulosin facilitates earlier clearance of stone fragments and reduces pain after shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi: results from an open-label randomized study.坦索罗辛有助于冲击波碎石术后肾结石碎片的早期清除并减轻疼痛:一项开放标签随机研究的结果
Urology. 2008 Nov;72(5):1006-11. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.035. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
9
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.输尿管软镜联合激光碎石术治疗多发性单侧肾内结石
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
10
Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm.?对于大于10毫米的肾结石,在体外冲击波碎石术后,小儿输尿管在输送结石碎片方面是否与成人输尿管一样高效?
J Urol. 2001 Nov;166(5):1862-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional and Morphological Changes Associated with Burst Wave Lithotripsy-Treated Pig Kidneys.与爆发波碎石术治疗的猪肾相关的功能和形态变化。
J Endourol. 2022 Dec;36(12):1580-1585. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0295. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: What is new?体外冲击波碎石术:有哪些新进展?
Arab J Urol. 2012 Sep;10(3):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 May 24.
3
Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy: a comprehensive review.优化冲击波碎石术:一项综合综述。
Rev Urol. 2013;15(2):49-60.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy today.如今的体外冲击波碎石术。
Indian J Urol. 2013 Jul;29(3):200-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.117283.
5
Removal of kidney stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is associated with delayed progression of chronic kidney disease.体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石与慢性肾脏病的进展延迟有关。
Yonsei Med J. 2012 Jul 1;53(4):708-14. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.4.708.
6
Novel instrumentation in urologic surgery: Shock wave lithotripsy.泌尿外科手术中的新型器械:冲击波碎石术。
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jul;26(3):423-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.70780.
7
Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.冲击波碎石术:技术和技术的进步。
Nat Rev Urol. 2009 Dec;6(12):660-70. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.216.