Alison J. Montpetit, PhD, RN, is Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Areej A. Alhareeri, BS, is Graduate Student, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Marty Montpetit, PhD, is Assistant Professor; and Angela R. Starkweather, PhD, ACNP-BC, CNRNA, is Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Lynne W. Elmore, PhD, is Associate Professor, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Kristin Filler, RN, BS, is Doctoral Student Fellow; Lathika Mohanraj, PhD, is Postdoctoral Fellow; Candace W. Burton, PhD, RN, FNE, is Assistant Professor; and Victoria S. Menzies, PhD, RN, PMHCNS-BC, is Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Debra E. Lyon, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, FNAP, FAAN, is Executive Associate Dean, and Thomas M. and Irene B. Kirbo Endowed Chair, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville. Colleen K. Jackson-Cook, PhD, is Professor, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Nurs Res. 2014 Jul-Aug;63(4):289-99. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000037.
The exciting discovery that telomere shortening is associated with many health conditions and that telomere lengths can be altered in response to social and environmental exposures has underscored the need for methods to accurately and consistently quantify telomere length.
The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary that compares and contrasts the current technologies used to assess telomere length.
Multiple methods have been developed for the study of telomeres. These techniques include quantification of telomere length by terminal restriction fragmentation-which was one of the earliest tools used for length assessment-making it the gold standard in telomere biology. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction provides the advantage of being able to use smaller amounts of DNA, thereby making it amenable to epidemiology studies involving large numbers of people. An alternative method uses fluorescent probes to quantify not only mean telomere lengths but also chromosome-specific telomere lengths; however, the downside of this approach is that it can only be used on mitotically active cells. Additional methods that permit assessment of the length of a subset of chromosome-specific telomeres or the subset of telomeres that demonstrate shortening are also reviewed.
Given the increased utility for telomere assessments as a biomarker in physiological, psychological, and biobehavioral research, it is important that investigators become familiar with the methodological nuances of the various procedures used for measuring telomere length. This will ensure that they are empowered to select an optimal assessment approach to meet the needs of their study designs. Gaining a better understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of various measurement techniques is important not only in individual studies, but also to further establish the science of telomere associations with biobehavioral phenomena.
端粒缩短与许多健康状况有关,端粒长度可以响应社会和环境暴露而改变,这一令人兴奋的发现突显了需要准确和一致地定量端粒长度的方法。
本文的目的是提供一个全面的总结,比较和对比目前用于评估端粒长度的技术。
已经开发出多种方法来研究端粒。这些技术包括通过端粒限制片段化来定量端粒长度 - 这是最早用于长度评估的工具之一,使其成为端粒生物学的金标准。定量聚合酶链反应具有能够使用较少量 DNA 的优点,从而使其适用于涉及大量人群的流行病学研究。另一种方法使用荧光探针不仅可以定量平均端粒长度,还可以定量染色体特异性端粒长度;然而,这种方法的缺点是它只能用于有丝分裂活性细胞。还审查了其他允许评估特定染色体端粒子集或显示缩短的端粒子集的长度的方法。
鉴于端粒评估作为生理、心理和生物行为研究中的生物标志物的增加实用性,研究人员熟悉用于测量端粒长度的各种程序的方法学细节非常重要。这将确保他们有能力选择最佳评估方法来满足他们的研究设计需求。更好地了解各种测量技术的优点和缺点不仅在个别研究中很重要,而且对于进一步确立端粒与生物行为现象的关联科学也很重要。