Sahar Hafeez Najmus, Sondekoppam Rakesh V, Ganapathy Sugantha, Armstrong Jerrold E, Shimizu Michael, Johnson Marjorie, Merrifield Peter, Galil Khadry A
From the Departments of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, and Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 2014 Sep;119(3):726-730. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000329.
Greater palatine nerve (GPN) block is commonly performed for maxillary and palatal anesthesia by using bony landmarks. Ultrasound (US) can be used to consistently identify greater palatine foramen (GPF) as a defect in the bony palate enabling US-guided injections near the foramen.
We scanned and injected 16 undissected well-embalmed hemisectioned cadaveric heads after excluding major anatomical malformations. A linear high-frequency hockey stick probe (7-13 MHz) positioned in long axis to the hard palate visualized GPF as a discontinuity in the hard palate. US-guided injections of 0.1 mL India ink were made in an oblique plane. Specimens were dissected immediately after injection, and dye distribution was noted. The success rate of identification of GPF, number of attempts, and number of successful injections were recorded. The technique was evaluated clinically in 7 patients undergoing dental procedures. Five patients had US-guided injections, and 2 patients received US-assisted greater palatine canal blocks.
GPF was successfully identified in 16 hemisectioned heads (n = 16). In 7 of 16 hemisectioned cadaveric specimens (n = 7/16), needle pass was seen on the US and traces of India ink were found within the greater palatine canal and pterygopalatine fossa. In the remaining heads (n = 9/16), the dye was observed in the mucosal tissue of the hard palate anterior to the GPF or in the soft palate. Clinical evaluation reconfirmed successful identification of GPF by US in 6 of 7 patients (n = 6/7). US-guided injections were successful in 6 of the 8 attempted blocks (n = 6/8) with median number (range) of attempts being 2 (1-4). US-assisted injections were successful in 2 patients (n = 2/2).
US has the potential to successfully locate and characterize GPF in normal and edentulous maxilla. US-guided GPN blocks can be technically challenging. The clinical applicability of US guidance or assistance for GPN block needs further evaluation in a larger sample of patients.
腭大神经(GPN)阻滞通常通过使用骨性标志来进行上颌和腭部麻醉。超声(US)可用于持续识别腭大孔(GPF),将其作为硬腭中的一个缺损,从而实现超声引导下在孔附近进行注射。
在排除主要解剖畸形后,我们对16个未解剖的、保存良好的半侧解剖尸体头部进行扫描和注射。将线性高频曲棍球棒探头(7 - 13 MHz)沿硬腭长轴放置,可将GPF显示为硬腭的连续性中断。在斜平面上进行超声引导下注射0.1 mL印度墨水。注射后立即解剖标本,并记录染料分布情况。记录GPF识别成功率、尝试次数和成功注射次数。在7例接受牙科手术的患者中对该技术进行临床评估。5例患者接受超声引导下注射,2例患者接受超声辅助腭大管阻滞。
在16个半侧解剖头部中成功识别出GPF(n = 16)。在16个半侧解剖尸体标本中的7个(n = 7/16)中,超声可见针道,在腭大管和翼腭窝内发现印度墨水痕迹。在其余头部(n = 9/16)中,染料出现在GPF前方硬腭的黏膜组织或软腭中。临床评估再次证实7例患者中有6例(n = 6/7)通过超声成功识别出GPF。在8次尝试阻滞中有6次(n = 6/8)超声引导下注射成功,尝试次数中位数(范围)为2次(1 - 4次)。超声辅助注射在2例患者中成功(n = 2/2)。
超声有潜力在正常和无牙上颌中成功定位和识别GPF。超声引导下的GPN阻滞在技术上可能具有挑战性。超声引导或辅助GPN阻滞的临床适用性需要在更大样本的患者中进一步评估。