Suppr超能文献

比较用于处于完全缓解期(CR1)的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者进行异基因造血干细胞移植(HCT)的两种方案(FB2与FB4)的静脉注射白消安(BU)剂量强度:欧洲血液与骨髓移植协会(EBMT)急性白血病工作组的报告

Comparing i.v. BU dose intensity between two regimens (FB2 vs FB4) for allogeneic HCT for AML in CR1: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT.

作者信息

Kharfan-Dabaja M A, Labopin M, Bazarbachi A, Hamladji R M, Blaise D, Socié G, Lioure B, Bermudez A, Lopez-Corral L, Or R, Arcese W, Fegueux N, Nagler A, Mohty M

机构信息

1] Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center/University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA [2] Division of Hematology-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT, Paris, France.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Sep;49(9):1170-5. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.133. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

Abstract

This retrospective analysis compared two regimens of fludarabine combined with i.v. BU 6.4 mg/kg (FB2) or BU 12.8 mg/kg (FB4) for allografting of AML in first CR. A total of 437 patients (median age: 50 years) were administered FB2 (n = 225, 51%) or FB4 (n = 212, 49%). Median follow-up time was 28 months. Use of FB2 resulted in a longer time to neutrophil engraftment (17 vs 15 days, P < 0.0001) but no difference in incidence of grade II-IV acute (P = 0.54) or chronic GVHD (P = 0.51). In patients < 50 years of age, FB2 was associated with a higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (33 ± 6% vs 20 ± 4%, P = 0.04), but there was no difference in 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) (P = 0.45), OS (P = 0.53) or non-relapse mortality (P = 0.17). In recipients ⩾ 50 years of age, FB2 resulted in better 2-year LFS (63 ± 4% vs 42 ± 7%, P = 0.02) and OS (68 ± 4% vs 45 ± 7%, P = 0.006); a lower 2-year non-relapse mortality, albeit not statistically significant (15 ± 3% vs 29 ± 6%, P = 0.06), was observed with FB2. FB2 is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in patients ⩾ 50 years of age and does not compromise survival when used in patients <50 years undergoing allogeneic transplantation for AML in first CR.

摘要

这项回顾性分析比较了两种氟达拉滨联合静脉注射白消安的方案,即6.4 mg/kg白消安(FB2)或12.8 mg/kg白消安(FB4),用于急性髓系白血病首次完全缓解期的同种异体移植。共有437例患者(中位年龄:50岁)接受了FB2(n = 225,51%)或FB4(n = 212,49%)治疗。中位随访时间为28个月。使用FB2导致中性粒细胞植入时间更长(17天对15天,P < 0.0001),但II-IV级急性(P = 0.54)或慢性移植物抗宿主病(P = 0.51)的发生率无差异。在年龄<50岁的患者中,FB2与较高的2年累积复发率相关(33 ± 6%对20 ± 4%,P = 0.04),但2年无白血病生存率(LFS)(P = 0.45)、总生存期(OS)(P = 0.53)或非复发死亡率(P = 0.17)无差异。在年龄≥50岁的受者中,FB2导致更好的2年LFS(63 ± 4%对42 ± 7%,P = 0.02)和OS(68 ± 4%对45 ± 7%,P = 0.006);观察到FB2的2年非复发死亡率较低,尽管无统计学意义(15 ± 3%对29 ± 6%,P = 0.06)。FB2对于年龄≥50岁的患者是一种有效且耐受性良好的方案,在年龄<50岁且接受急性髓系白血病首次完全缓解期同种异体移植的患者中使用时,不会影响生存率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验