Sugisaki Norihide, Kurokawa Sadao, Okada Junichi, Kanehisa Hiroaki
Center for Environment, Health and Field Sciences, Chiba University, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan; Waseda Institute for Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Center for Liberal Arts, Meiji Gakuin University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101203. eCollection 2014.
Athletes who aim to improve both muscular endurance and power often perform exercises that involve similar joint actions under different lifting conditions, such as changes in the load or speed, which are implemented at different times during a periodized exercise program or simultaneously. The prescribed exercises are considered to recruit the same muscles even if the lifting conditions differ to each other. The present study aimed to clarify this by examining whether the recruitment of individual hip and knee muscles during the squat exercise differs between lifting conditions adopted for muscular endurance and power training regimens. Moderately trained men performed back squats (BS), with a load of approximately 60% of one repetition maximum, as a muscular endurance training exercise, and they performed plyometric squat jumping (PSJ) for power training. During each exercise, the lower limb joint torques and the recruitment of five hip and knee muscles were determined with inverse-dynamics and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. While the maximal and mean knee joint torques were greater during PSJ than during BS (p<0.01), the T2 values for the quadriceps femoris muscle did not differ between the exercises. In contrast, the T2 values of the gluteus maximus and hip adductor muscles were higher during PSJ (p<0.05) than during BS, although there was no significant difference in the mean hip extension torque between the two exercises. The current results indicate that the individual use of the agonist muscles differs between BS and PSJ, and it does not always correspond with the joint kinetics during the exercises. Therefore, in addition to the exercise type, the lifting condition should also be taken into consideration as a determinant of the major muscles trained during a resistance exercise.
旨在提高肌肉耐力和力量的运动员通常会进行一些练习,这些练习在不同的举重条件下涉及相似的关节动作,例如负荷或速度的变化,这些变化在周期性训练计划的不同时间实施或同时进行。即使举重条件彼此不同,规定的练习也被认为会募集相同的肌肉。本研究旨在通过检查深蹲练习中,针对肌肉耐力和力量训练方案所采用的不同举重条件下,髋部和膝部各肌肉的募集情况是否存在差异来阐明这一点。中度训练的男性进行了负重约为一次最大重复量60%的后深蹲(BS),作为肌肉耐力训练练习,并且他们进行了增强式深蹲跳(PSJ)以进行力量训练。在每次练习期间,分别通过逆动力学和T2加权磁共振成像来确定下肢关节扭矩以及五块髋部和膝部肌肉的募集情况。虽然PSJ期间的最大和平均膝关节扭矩大于BS期间(p<0.01),但股四头肌的T2值在两种练习之间没有差异。相比之下,尽管两种练习之间的平均髋部伸展扭矩没有显著差异,但在PSJ期间臀大肌和髋内收肌的T2值高于BS期间(p<0.05)。当前结果表明,BS和PSJ之间主要肌肉的个体使用情况不同,并且并不总是与练习期间的关节动力学相对应。因此,除练习类型外,举重条件也应作为抗阻训练期间主要训练肌肉的一个决定因素加以考虑。