Furre Astrid, Sandvik Leiv, Heyerdahl Sonja, Friis Svein, Knutzen Maria, Hanssen-Bauer Ketil
Ms. Furre and Dr. Knutzen are with the Center for Forensic Psychiatry, Center for National and Regional Mental Health Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (e-mail:
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Nov 1;65(11):1367-72. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300429.
Use of restraint in psychiatric treatment is controversial. This study compared social, mental health, and treatment characteristics of restrained and nonrestrained adolescents in acute psychiatric inpatient units.
In a retrospective case-control design, we included all adolescents restrained during 2008-2010 (N=288) in all acute psychiatric inpatient units that accepted involuntarily admitted adolescents in Norway (N=16). A control group (N=288) of nonrestrained adolescent patients was randomly selected from the same units. Restraint included mechanical restraint, pharmacological restraint, seclusion, and physical holding. Data sources were electronic patient records and restraint protocols. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to predict restraint use.
Compared with nonrestrained adolescents, restrained adolescents were more likely to be immigrants, to live in institutions or foster care, and to have had involvement with child protection services. The restrained adolescents were more likely to have psychotic, eating, or externalizing disorders and lower scores on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). They had multiple admissions and longer stays and were more often involuntarily referred. When the analysis adjusted for age, gender, living arrangements, child protection services involvement, and ICD-10 diagnoses, several variables were significantly associated with restraint: immigrant background, low CGAS score, number of admissions, length of stay, and involuntary referral.
Restrained and nonrestrained patients differed significantly in social, mental health, and treatment characteristics. These findings may be useful in developing strategies for reducing the use of restraint in child and adolescent psychiatry.
在精神科治疗中使用约束措施存在争议。本研究比较了急性精神科住院病房中接受约束和未接受约束的青少年的社会、心理健康及治疗特征。
采用回顾性病例对照设计,纳入了2008年至2010年期间挪威所有接受非自愿入院青少年的16家急性精神科住院病房中所有接受约束的青少年(N = 288)。从不接受约束的青少年患者中随机选取对照组(N = 288),这些患者来自相同病房。约束措施包括机械约束、药物约束、隔离和身体控制。数据来源为电子病历和约束记录。进行二元逻辑回归分析以预测约束措施的使用情况。
与未接受约束的青少年相比,接受约束的青少年更有可能是移民,居住在福利院或寄养机构,并且曾与儿童保护服务机构有过接触。接受约束的青少年更有可能患有精神病性、进食或外化性障碍,且在儿童总体评估量表(CGAS)上得分较低。他们多次入院且住院时间更长,更常是非自愿转诊。在对年龄、性别、生活安排、儿童保护服务机构接触情况及国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)诊断进行分析调整后,有几个变量与约束措施显著相关:移民背景、CGAS得分低、入院次数、住院时间和非自愿转诊。
接受约束和未接受约束的患者在社会、心理健康及治疗特征方面存在显著差异。这些发现可能有助于制定减少儿童和青少年精神病学中约束措施使用的策略。