Suppr超能文献

在一家私立精神病院,约束和隔离的使用情况及其相关因素:儿童和青少年患者的比较。

Prevalence and precursors of the use of restraint and seclusion in a private psychiatric hospital: comparison of child and adolescent patients.

机构信息

Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ 07666, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 May;40(3):224-31. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0396-2.

Abstract

The use of restraint and seclusion is highly regulated in psychiatric inpatient settings. However, the majority of studies of restraint and seclusion are based on public hospitals serving adult patients, with some limited data available on adolescents and children. This paper presents prospectively collected data on restraint and seclusion over a 2-year period at a private psychiatric hospital whose patients include large numbers of both adolescents and pre-adolescent children. 2 years of restraint and seclusion data were analyzed on a total of 2,411 unique patients. Types of seclusion included in-room seclusion on the treatment unit and off-unit seclusion in a separate seclusion annex. Restraints consisted solely of short term (<15 min) and longer term (>14 min) manual restraints. The use of IM medication was also recorded. The precipitants of these events were examined. These included physical and verbal threats, stabbing or throwing objects, attempts to elope, attempts to hurt one's self or another, or property destruction. Out of 2,411 child and adolescent in-patients admitted during the period under review, only 703 (29%) experienced restraint or seclusion. Among these, the modal number of events per patient was one (n = 156), but the maximum number of occurrences was 163. Child patients had a much higher frequency of events (n = 396, 53%) than adolescents (n = 307, 19%). There were notable differences in the types of seclusion events, with children typically experiencing in-room seclusion on the unit. When age was examined as a continuous variable, younger patients had a higher prevalence of restraint and seclusion, significantly more restraint and seclusion, and these restraint and seclusion events were significantly shorter than those seen in older patients. Multiple other potential determinants of these events were examined, including diagnosis, symptom severity at admission, age, and gender, but none of these predicted these events. Restraint and seclusion events were more common for children and less so for adolescents, with robust age effects for the likelihood of any seclusions, the number of seclusions and restraints, and the duration of seclusions and restraints. Patients who experienced restraint or seclusion typically required it only once during their hospitalization. Only age was found to be a predictor of the restraint and seclusion variables. Given these findings, it appears that management of agitated behavior in children and adolescents may be a qualitatively different phenomenon. Future research should be directed at understanding the determinants of high frequency agitated behavior and developing alternatives to seclusion or restraint.

摘要

在精神病住院患者中,约束和隔离的使用受到高度监管。然而,大多数关于约束和隔离的研究都是基于服务成人患者的公立医院进行的,只有一些关于青少年和儿童的有限数据。本文前瞻性地收集了一家私立精神病院两年内的约束和隔离数据,该医院的患者包括大量青少年和青春期前儿童。

在总共 2411 名独特的患者中,对 2 年的约束和隔离数据进行了分析。隔离的类型包括在治疗单元内的室内隔离和在单独的隔离附楼内的单元外隔离。约束仅包括短期(<15 分钟)和长期(>14 分钟)手动约束。还记录了 IM 药物的使用情况。检查了这些事件的促成因素。这些因素包括身体和言语威胁、刺伤或投掷物体、逃跑企图、自残或伤害他人或破坏财产。

在审查期间入院的 2411 名儿童和青少年患者中,只有 703 名(29%)经历过约束或隔离。在这些患者中,每名患者的事件模式数量为一个(n=156),但发生的最大次数为 163 次。儿童患者的事件频率(n=396,53%)远高于青少年(n=307,19%)。隔离事件的类型存在显著差异,儿童通常在单元内接受室内隔离。当以连续变量检查年龄时,年龄较小的患者约束和隔离的发生率更高,约束和隔离的次数更多,并且这些约束和隔离事件明显短于年龄较大的患者。还检查了其他一些可能的潜在决定因素,包括诊断、入院时的症状严重程度、年龄和性别,但没有一个预测到这些事件。约束和隔离事件在儿童中更为常见,在青少年中则较少见,对于任何隔离、隔离和约束的数量以及隔离和约束的持续时间,年龄都有显著的影响。经历过约束或隔离的患者在住院期间通常只需要一次。只有年龄被发现是约束和隔离变量的预测因素。

考虑到这些发现,在儿童和青少年中管理激动行为似乎是一种性质不同的现象。未来的研究应该致力于了解高频激动行为的决定因素,并开发替代隔离或约束的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验