Oliveira Dayane Carvalho Ramos Salles de, Souza-Júnior Eduardo José, Prieto Lúcia Trazzi, Coppini Erick Kamiya, Maia Rodrigo Rocha, Paulillo Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini
Restorative Dentistry Department, Piracicaba Dental School - State University of Campinas, 901 Limeira Ave, Areião, Piracicaba, 13414-903, SP, Brazil.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;26(4):288-95. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12113. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
The current study evaluated the effect of accelerated artificial aging (AAA) on the color stability (CS) and degree of conversion (DC) of nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites associated to different adhesive systems in direct esthetic restorations.
Eighty bovine incisors were used to obtained dentin blocks (4 × 4 × 1 mm). The restorative systems were bonded to the blocks and photoactivated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Three adhesive systems were used: Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (conventional of three steps), Tetric N-Bond (conventional of two steps) and ClearFill SE Bond (self-etching). Also, two composites were used: Filtek Z350 XT (nanofilled) and IPS Empress Direct (nanohybrid). The restorations were made using a silicone mold placed on top of the prepared dentin blocks (N = 10). CS was measured after 300 hours of AAA by means of ultraviolet light using a spectrophotometer and CIE Lab* parameters on the top surface of the composite and at the bonded interface. The DC was performed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (N = 10). Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
The adhesive systems had no significant influence on the color stability (ΔE) of either the restoration surface (α = 0.90) or the bonded interface (α = 0.78). However, composite influenced the color as measured by ΔE and isolated coordinates (α < 0.001). The nanohybrid composite showed increased DC values (67%) compared with the nanofilled (61%) with statistically significant differences (α < 0.001).
The adhesive system did not affect the final color of direct esthetic restorations. The nanohybrid composite demonstrated a higher DC and increased color stability after AAA compared to the nanofilled composite.
The long-term color stability of composite restorations is a critical aspect of esthetic restorative procedures. Optimal Polymerization behavior of resin composite as indicated by the degree of conversion also influence on the color stability after artificial aging of composite restorations.
本研究评估加速人工老化(AAA)对直接美学修复中与不同粘结系统相关的纳米填充和纳米混合树脂复合材料的颜色稳定性(CS)和转化率(DC)的影响。
使用80颗牛切牙获取牙本质块(4×4×1mm)。按照制造商说明将修复系统粘结到牙本质块上并光固化。使用了三种粘结系统:Adper Scotchbond多功能粘结剂(三步法传统粘结剂)、Tetric N-Bond(两步法传统粘结剂)和ClearFill SE Bond(自酸蚀粘结剂)。此外,还使用了两种复合材料:Filtek Z350 XT(纳米填充)和IPS Empress Direct(纳米混合)。使用置于制备好的牙本质块上的硅橡胶模具制作修复体(N = 10)。通过分光光度计利用紫外线在AAA 300小时后测量复合材料顶面和粘结界面处的CS,并使用CIE Lab*参数。使用傅里叶变换红外光谱法进行DC测量(N = 10)。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。
粘结系统对修复体表面(α = 0.90)或粘结界面(α = 0.78)的颜色稳定性(ΔE)均无显著影响。然而,复合材料对通过ΔE和单独坐标测量的颜色有影响(α < 0.001)。与纳米填充复合材料(61%)相比,纳米混合复合材料的DC值增加(67%),差异具有统计学意义(α < 0.001)。
粘结系统不影响直接美学修复体的最终颜色。与纳米填充复合材料相比,纳米混合复合材料在AAA后表现出更高的DC和更高的颜色稳定性。
复合树脂修复体的长期颜色稳定性是美学修复程序的关键方面。转化率所表明的树脂复合材料的最佳聚合行为也会影响复合树脂修复体人工老化后的颜色稳定性。