• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撤回:机械通气危重症患者早期与晚期或不进行气管切开术对死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

RETRACTED: Effect of early versus late or no tracheostomy on mortality of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Jun 26. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70125-0.

DOI:10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70125-0
PMID:24981963
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delay of tracheostomy for roughly 2 weeks after translaryngeal intubation of critically ill patients is the presently recommended practice and is supported by findings from large trials. However, these trials were suboptimally powered to detect small but clinically important effects on mortality. We aimed to assess the mortality benefit of early versus late or no tracheostomy in critically ill patients who need mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, DOAJ, the Cochrane Library, references of relevant articles, scientific conference proceedings, and grey literature up to Aug 31, 2013, to identify randomised controlled trials comparing early tracheostomy (done within 1 week after translaryngeal intubation) with late (done any time after the first week of mechanical ventilation) or no tracheostomy and reporting on mortality or incidence of pneumonia in critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality during the stay in the intensive-care unit and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR), pooled risk ratios (RR), and 95% CIs with a random-effects model. All but complications analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis.

FINDINGS

Analyses of 13 trials (2434 patients, 800 deaths) showed that all-cause mortality in the intensive-care unit was significantly lower in patients assigned to the early versus the late or no tracheostomy group (OR 0·72, 95% CI 0·53-0·98; p=0·04). This finding represents an 18% reduction in the relative risk of death, translating to a 5% absolute improvement in survival (from 65% to 70%). This result persisted when we considered only trials with a low risk of bias (663 deaths; OR 0·68, 95% CI 0·49-0·95; p=0·02; eight trials with 1934 patients). There was no evidence of a difference between the compared groups for 1-year mortality (788 deaths; RR 0·93, 95% CI 0·85-1·02; p=0·14; three trials with 1529 patients).

INTERPRETATION

The synthesised evidence suggests that early tracheostomy is associated with lower mortality in the intensive-care unit than late or no tracheostomy; a finding that might question the present practice of delaying tracheostomy beyond the first week after translaryngeal intubation in mechanically ventilated patients. However, the scarcity of a beneficial effect on long-term mortality and the potential complications associated with tracheostomy need careful consideration; thus, further studies focusing on long-term outcomes are warranted.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

在接受经鼻气管插管的危重病患者中,大约 2 周后行气管切开术是目前推荐的做法,并得到了大型试验的支持。然而,这些试验的效力不足以检测到对死亡率有较小但临床意义的影响。我们旨在评估早期与晚期或无气管切开术对需要机械通气的危重病患者的死亡率的益处。

方法

我们系统地检索了 PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、Web of Science、DOAJ、Cochrane 图书馆、相关文章的参考文献、科学会议录和灰色文献,截至 2013 年 8 月 31 日,以确定比较早期气管切开术(在经鼻气管插管后 1 周内进行)与晚期(在机械通气的第一周后任何时间进行)或无气管切开术并报告死亡率或危重病患者机械通气下肺炎发生率的随机对照试验。我们的主要结局是重症监护病房住院期间的全因死亡率和呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。我们使用随机效应模型计算了汇总优势比(OR)、汇总风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。除并发症分析外,所有分析均基于意向治疗。

结果

对 13 项试验(2434 名患者,800 例死亡)的分析表明,与晚期或无气管切开术组相比,早期气管切开术组的重症监护病房全因死亡率显著降低(OR 0.72,95%CI 0.53-0.98;p=0.04)。这一发现代表相对死亡风险降低了 18%,这意味着生存率提高了 5%(从 65%提高到 70%)。当我们仅考虑偏倚风险较低的试验时(663 例死亡;OR 0.68,95%CI 0.49-0.95;p=0.02;8 项试验,1934 名患者),这一结果仍然存在。两组间 1 年死亡率无差异(788 例死亡;RR 0.93,95%CI 0.85-1.02;p=0.14;3 项试验,1529 名患者)。

解释

综合证据表明,与晚期或无气管切开术相比,早期气管切开术与重症监护病房死亡率降低相关;这一发现可能质疑目前在接受机械通气的患者中延迟至经鼻气管插管后第一周以上行气管切开术的做法。然而,气管切开术对长期死亡率的有益影响以及与气管切开术相关的潜在并发症需要仔细考虑;因此,有必要进行进一步关注长期结局的研究。

资金

无。

相似文献

1
RETRACTED: Effect of early versus late or no tracheostomy on mortality of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.撤回:机械通气危重症患者早期与晚期或不进行气管切开术对死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Jun 26. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70125-0.
2
Effect of early versus late or no tracheostomy on mortality and pneumonia of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期与晚期或不进行气管切开术对机械通气危重症患者死亡率和肺炎的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Feb;3(2):150-158. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00007-7.
3
Early versus late tracheostomy in people with multiple trauma.多发伤患者早期与晚期气管切开术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 6;8(8):CD015932. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015932.pub2.
4
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.危重症 COVID-19 患者的早期与晚期气管切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 20;11(11):CD015532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015532.
5
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients.在危重症成年患者中,喉罩气道与气管内导管用于经皮扩张气管切开术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 30;2014(6):CD009901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009901.pub2.
6
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia.危重症患者的口腔卫生护理以预防呼吸机相关性肺炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 25;10(10):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub3.
7
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia.重症患者的口腔卫生护理以预防呼吸机相关性肺炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 13(8):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults.对危重症成年患者补充谷氨酰胺
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 9;2014(9):CD010050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010050.pub2.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Tracheostomy risk factors and outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤后的气管切开术危险因素及预后
Brain Inj. 2016;30(13-14):1642-1647. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1199915. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
2
A randomized clinical trial for the timing of tracheotomy in critically ill patients: factors precluding inclusion in a single center study.一项关于重症患者气管切开时机的随机临床试验:排除纳入单中心研究的因素。
Crit Care. 2014 Oct 29;18(5):585. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0585-y.