1Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, SWEDEN; and 2Research Unit EA4660 Department, Culture Sport Health Society and Exercise Performance Health Innovation Platform, Franche-Comté University, Besançon, FRANCE.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Feb;47(2):381-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000413.
Orienteering athletes must adapt to running on various surfaces, with biomechanics likely contributing to performance. Here, our aims were to identify the effect of athletic status and of surface on the running biomechanics of orienteers.
Seven elite and seven amateur male orienteers ran 20 m on road, path, and forest surfaces at maximal, 3.8 m·s, and 85% of maximal speeds. A three-dimensional motion capturing system monitored temporal gait and lower extremity kinematic parameters. Data were analyzed using mixed effects models that considered surface (road-path-forest), group (elite-amateur), and surface-group interaction effects.
Forest running at maximal speed was slower and involved longer step and cycle times, greater knee extension at foot strike, smaller peak hip flexion and dorsiflexion during stance, and increased ranges of vertical pelvis motion compared with those observed on the road. Elites specifically exhibited greater hip extension at foot strike, larger dorsiflexion at toe-off, and lower pelvis at foot strike and toe-off, whereas amateurs displayed longer stance, greater plantarflexion at foot strike, and greater knee with lesser ankle motion. At the slowest speed, subjects exhibited greater knee flexion at foot strike, greater dorsiflexion at toe-off, shorter strides, smaller peak dorsiflexion during stance, and greater hip, knee, and vertical pelvis motions on forest than on road surfaces. Elites specifically demonstrated shorter stance, step, and cycle times whereas amateurs did not.
Orienteering athletes adjusted their running biomechanics when off-road, with distinct adaptations observed in elite versus amateur competitors. The vertical pelvis motion was consistently greater when running off-road, coherent with reported increases in energy expenditure. However, our athletes did not exhibit more crouched lower limb postures when sprinting in the forest, indicating alternative responses to off-road running to that previously proposed by "Groucho" running.
定向运动员必须适应在各种表面上跑步,生物力学可能对表现有影响。在这里,我们的目的是确定运动员的状态和表面对定向运动员跑步生物力学的影响。
7 名精英男性和 7 名业余男性定向运动员在道路、小径和森林表面上以最大速度、3.8 m·s 和最大速度的 85%进行 20 m 跑步。一个三维运动捕捉系统监测了时间步态和下肢运动学参数。使用混合效应模型分析数据,该模型考虑了表面(道路-小径-森林)、组(精英-业余)和表面-组相互作用的影响。
最大速度下的森林跑步速度较慢,涉及更长的步幅和周期时间,脚部触地时膝关节伸展更大,站立时髋关节前屈和背屈峰值较小,垂直骨盆运动范围增加与在道路上观察到的相比。精英运动员在脚部触地时表现出更大的髋关节伸展,在脚趾离地时表现出更大的背屈,以及在脚部触地和脚趾离地时更低的骨盆,而业余运动员则表现出更长的支撑阶段,脚部触地时更大的跖屈和更小的踝关节运动,以及更大的膝关节和更小的踝关节运动。在最慢的速度下,与在道路表面相比,受试者在脚部触地时表现出更大的膝关节屈曲,在脚趾离地时表现出更大的背屈,步幅更短,站立时的最大背屈更小,髋关节、膝关节和垂直骨盆运动更大。精英运动员特别是表现出更短的支撑阶段、步幅和周期时间,而业余运动员则没有。
定向运动员在越野时调整了他们的跑步生物力学,在精英与业余选手之间观察到了明显的适应。当在越野时,垂直骨盆运动始终更大,与报道的能量消耗增加一致。然而,我们的运动员在森林中冲刺时并没有表现出更弯曲的下肢姿势,这表明了对越野跑步的替代反应,而不是以前提出的“Groucho”跑步。