Edger Patrick P, Tang Michelle, Bird Kevin A, Mayfield Dustin R, Conant Gavin, Mummenhoff Klaus, Koch Marcus A, Pires J Chris
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America; Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e101341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101341. eCollection 2014.
The internal transcribed spacers of the nuclear ribosomal RNA gene cluster, termed ITS1 and ITS2, are the most frequently used nuclear markers for phylogenetic analyses across many eukaryotic groups including most plant families. The reasons for the popularity of these markers include: 1.) Ease of amplification due to high copy number of the gene clusters, 2.) Available cost-effective methods and highly conserved primers, 3.) Rapidly evolving markers (i.e. variable between closely related species), and 4.) The assumption (and/or treatment) that these sequences are non-functional, neutrally evolving phylogenetic markers. Here, our analyses of ITS1 and ITS2 for 50 species suggest that both sequences are instead under selective constraints to preserve proper secondary structure, likely to maintain complete self-splicing functions, and thus are not neutrally-evolving phylogenetic markers. Our results indicate the majority of sequence sites are co-evolving with other positions to form proper secondary structure, which has implications for phylogenetic inference. We also found that the lowest energy state and total number of possible alternate secondary structures are highly significantly different between ITS regions and random sequences with an identical overall length and Guanine-Cytosine (GC) content. Lastly, we review recent evidence highlighting some additional problematic issues with using these regions as the sole markers for phylogenetic studies, and thus strongly recommend additional markers and cost-effective approaches for future studies to estimate phylogenetic relationships.
核糖体RNA基因簇的内转录间隔区,称为ITS1和ITS2,是许多真核生物类群(包括大多数植物科)系统发育分析中最常用的核标记。这些标记受欢迎的原因包括:1.)由于基因簇的高拷贝数,易于扩增;2.)有经济有效的方法和高度保守的引物;3.)快速进化的标记(即密切相关物种之间存在差异);4.)假定(和/或处理)这些序列是无功能的、中性进化的系统发育标记。在这里,我们对50个物种的ITS1和ITS2进行的分析表明,相反,这两个序列都受到选择性限制,以保持适当的二级结构,可能是为了维持完整的自我剪接功能,因此不是中性进化的系统发育标记。我们的结果表明,大多数序列位点与其他位置共同进化以形成适当的二级结构,这对系统发育推断有影响。我们还发现,ITS区域与具有相同总长度和鸟嘌呤-胞嘧啶(GC)含量的随机序列之间,最低能量状态和可能的交替二级结构总数存在高度显著差异。最后,我们回顾了最近的证据,强调了将这些区域用作系统发育研究的唯一标记的一些其他问题,因此强烈建议在未来的研究中使用额外的标记和经济有效的方法来估计系统发育关系。