Suppr超能文献

高龄老人高血压试验的亚组分析和符合方案分析。

Subgroup and per-protocol analyses from the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial.

作者信息

Beckett Nigel, Peters Ruth, Leonetti Gastone, Duggan Joe, Fagard Robert, Thijs Lut, Narkiewicz Krzysztof, McCormack Terry, Banya Winston, Fletcher Astrid, Bulpitt Christopher

机构信息

aImperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, UK bMedical University of Milano, Cardiovascular Rehabilitation and Cardiac Disease Unit, Milan, Italy cMater Hospital, Dublin, Ireland dHypertension & Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium eDepartment Hypertension and Diabetology, Meical University of Gdansk, Poland fWhitby Group Practice, Whitby gLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK *All committee members and investigators are listed in the On-line Supplement.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2014 Jul;32(7):1478-87; discussion 1487. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000195.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The results of the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial showed positive benefits from blood pressure-lowering treatment in those aged 80 and over.

METHOD

An analysis by the pre-specified subgroups [age, sex, history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and initial SBP] was performed. The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 3845 participants aged 80 and over with SBPs of 160-199 mmHg and diastolic pressures below 110 mmHg recruited from Europe, China, Australasia and Tunisia. Active treatment was indapamide sustained-release 1.5 mg with the addition of perindopril 2-4 mg as required to reach a target blood pressure of less than 150/80 mmHg.

RESULTS

For total mortality, benefits were consistent: men [hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-1.11], women (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.99), those aged 80-84.9 (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96), those aged 85 and over (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.64-1.20), those with a history of CVD (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.48-1.20) and those without (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.65-0.99), and similarly across a range of baseline SBPs. The point estimates for cardiovascular mortality, strokes, heart failure and cardiovascular events were all in favour of benefit. In the per-protocol analysis, strokes were reduced by 34% (P = 0.026), total mortality by 28% (P = 0.001), cardiovascular event by 37% (P < 0.001) and heart failure by 72% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In hypertensive patients aged 80 or more, treatment based on indapamide (sustained-release) 1.5 mg showed consistent benefits across pre-specified subgroups including those without established CVD (the majority), supporting the need for treatment even at this advanced age. There were too few aged 90 or over to determine benefit from treatment at extreme age.

摘要

背景

高龄老人高血压试验结果显示,80岁及以上人群进行降压治疗有积极益处。

方法

按预先设定的亚组[年龄、性别、心血管疾病(CVD)病史和初始收缩压]进行分析。高龄老人高血压试验是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,纳入了3845名年龄在80岁及以上、收缩压为160 - 199 mmHg且舒张压低于110 mmHg的参与者,这些参与者来自欧洲、中国、澳大拉西亚和突尼斯。积极治疗方案为吲达帕胺缓释片1.5 mg,并根据需要加用培哚普利2 - 4 mg,以使血压目标值低于150/80 mmHg。

结果

在总死亡率方面,益处是一致的:男性[风险比0.82,95%置信区间(CI)0.62 - 1.11],女性(风险比0.77,95% CI 0.66 - 0.99),80 - 84.9岁人群(风险比0.76,95% CI 0.60 - 0.96),85岁及以上人群(风险比0.87,95% CI 0.64 - 1.20),有CVD病史者(风险比0.76,95% CI 0.48 - 1.20)和无CVD病史者(风险比0.81,95% CI 0.65 - 0.99),并且在一系列基线收缩压水平中情况类似。心血管死亡率、中风、心力衰竭和心血管事件的点估计值均显示有益处。在符合方案分析中,中风减少了34%(P = 0.026),总死亡率降低了28%(P = 0.001),心血管事件减少了37%(P < 0.001),心力衰竭减少了72%(P < 0.001)。

结论

在80岁及以上的高血压患者中,基于1.5 mg吲达帕胺(缓释片)的治疗在包括无CVD病史者(大多数)在内的预先设定亚组中显示出一致的益处,支持即使在这个高龄阶段也需要进行治疗。90岁及以上的参与者太少,无法确定在极高龄时治疗的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验