Hoffmann U
Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Geriatrie/Angiologie, Diabetologie, Endokrinologie, Nephrologie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Str. 86, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Internist (Berl). 2018 Apr;59(4):309-315. doi: 10.1007/s00108-018-0388-3.
The systolic blood pressure intervention trial (SPRINT) published in 2015 has opened up new discussions on whether a lower blood pressure target as recommended by the current guidelines would be better for some patient groups.
To review patient groups in which lower blood pressure targets would not be better.
The results of SPRINT, its post-hoc and subgroup analyses, other studies and newer studies, as well as metaanalyses on the topic of blood pressure targets are reviewed and discussed. Studies with patients excluded from the SPRINT study were also analysed. The current international guidelines and recommendations of the Deutsche Hochdruckliga e. V. DHL® are included.
Blood pressure monitoring methods differed considerably in the previously published studies. The low blood pressure value in SPRINT was mainly achieved due to the unusual method of blood pressure monitoring used and, as such, cannot be compared with blood pressure values in other studies. Based on current evidence, "the lower the better" should not be recommended in the following patient groups: older patients, in particular infirm older patients, patients with diabetes, patients without coronary heart disease or with low cardiovascular risk.
When determining a blood pressure target, the method of blood pressure monitoring should be defined. A lower blood pressure target has been shown to be better in some well defined patient groups. However, adverse events due to antihypertensive medications should always be taken into account. Given the multiple exclusion criteria in trials and the results of many studies, "new" lower blood pressure targets could not be recommended in a large population of patients.
2015年发表的收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)开启了关于现行指南推荐的更低血压目标是否对某些患者群体更有益的新讨论。
回顾更低血压目标并非更有益的患者群体。
回顾并讨论了SPRINT的结果、事后分析和亚组分析、其他研究以及更新的研究,以及关于血压目标主题的荟萃分析。还分析了将患者排除在SPRINT研究之外的研究。纳入了当前的国际指南以及德国高血压联盟(Deutsche Hochdruckliga e.V. DHL®)的建议。
先前发表的研究中血压监测方法差异很大。SPRINT中的低血压值主要是由于所采用的不寻常血压监测方法而实现的,因此无法与其他研究中的血压值进行比较。基于当前证据,在以下患者群体中不应推荐“越低越好”:老年患者,尤其是体弱的老年患者、糖尿病患者、无冠心病或心血管风险低的患者。
确定血压目标时,应明确血压监测方法。在一些明确界定的患者群体中,更低的血压目标已被证明更有益。然而,应始终考虑抗高血压药物引起的不良事件。鉴于试验中的多项排除标准以及许多研究的结果,在大量患者中不能推荐“新的”更低血压目标。