First Michael B
Dr. First is Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and Research Psychiatrist, Biometrics Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(2):191-201.
Given that paraphilic disorders are diagnosed largely in forensic settings, virtually every significant change in the criteria has forensic implications. Several controversial changes were considered during the DSM-5 revision process, but most were ultimately not included in the published text. However, any changes that make it easier to assign a paraphilic disorder diagnosis to an individual must be considered with caution. Criterion A for paraphilic disorders has been changed to reduce one potential risk that could result in false-positive diagnoses (i.e., allowing evaluators to diagnose a paraphilic disorder based entirely on the presence of sexual acts). In contrast, many of the other changes including some of those in the text, make it easier to diagnose a specific paraphilia and thus increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses. Since the assignment of a paraphilic disorder diagnosis can result in adverse legal consequences, the actual forensic impact of the changes will depend on how the legal system incorporates these new definitions into statutes and case law.
鉴于性偏好障碍主要是在法医环境中进行诊断的,标准中的几乎每一项重大变化都具有法医方面的影响。在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版修订过程中考虑了一些有争议的变化,但大多数最终未被纳入已发表的文本中。然而,任何使更容易将性偏好障碍诊断应用于个体的变化都必须谨慎考虑。性偏好障碍的A标准已经改变,以减少一种可能导致假阳性诊断的潜在风险(即允许评估者完全基于性行为的存在来诊断性偏好障碍)。相比之下,许多其他变化,包括文本中的一些变化,使得更容易诊断特定的性偏好,从而增加了假阳性诊断的风险。由于性偏好障碍诊断的应用可能会导致不利的法律后果,这些变化的实际法医影响将取决于法律系统如何将这些新定义纳入法规和判例法中。