Suppr超能文献

DSM-5 中的性癖障碍。

Paraphilias in the DSM-5.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; email:

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455; email:

出版信息

Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:383-406. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093330. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

Abstract

This review summarizes and critically examines the changes in how the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) characterizes paraphilias. Attention is paid to the diagnostic options that were included in DSM-5, the decision not to include criterion sets for two additional disorders (paraphilic coercive disorder and hypersexual behavior disorder), and the further decision not to modify the diagnosis of pedophilic to pedohebephilic disorder. The three most significant changes are (a) the move to distinguish paraphilias from paraphilic disorders (allowing unusual sexual interests to be studied by researchers but only regarded as disorders when they cause distress or dysfunction), (b) introducing criteria describing paraphilic disorders as being in remission (when they no longer cause distress or dysfunction), and (c) clarifying the relationship between behavior and paraphilias. Concerns are noted about the forensic use of diagnoses and the lack of funding for field trials in this revision of the DSM. Suggestions are given for future directions in order to further research efficacy and clinical diagnosis.

摘要

这篇综述总结并批判性地考察了《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)对性癖障碍特征的描述变化。关注的焦点是 DSM-5 中包含的诊断选项,不包括另外两种障碍(性施虐障碍和性成瘾障碍)的标准集的决定,以及不修改恋童癖诊断为恋童癖障碍的进一步决定。三个最重要的变化是:(a) 将性癖障碍与性癖障碍区分开来(允许研究人员研究不寻常的性兴趣,但只有当它们引起痛苦或功能障碍时才被视为障碍);(b) 引入描述性癖障碍缓解的标准(当它们不再引起痛苦或功能障碍时);(c) 澄清行为与性癖之间的关系。本文注意到了在 DSM 修订版中诊断的法医用途和缺乏现场试验资金的问题。为进一步研究疗效和临床诊断提供了未来方向的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验