Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, D-71706 Markgröningen, Germany.
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):889-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33280.
We report our experience of revision total hip replacement (THR) using the Revitan curved modular titanium fluted revision stem in patients with a full spectrum of proximal femoral defects. A total of 112 patients (116 revisions) with a mean age of 73.4 years (39 to 90) were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 7.5 years (5.3 to 9.1). A total of 12 patients (12 hips) died but their data were included in the survival analysis, and four patients (4 hips) were lost to follow-up. The clinical outcome, proximal bone regeneration and subsidence were assessed for 101 hips. The mean Harris Hip Score was 88.2 (45.8 to 100) after five years and there was an increase of the mean Barnett and Nordin-Score, a measure of the proximal bone regeneration, of 20.8 (-3.1 to 52.7). Five stems had to be revised (4.3%), three (2.9%) showed subsidence, five (4.3%) a dislocation and two of 85 aseptic revisions (2.3%) a periprosthetic infection. At the latest follow-up, the survival with revision of the stem as the endpoint was 95.7% (95% confidence interval 91.9% to 99.4%) and with aseptic loosening as the endpoint, was 100%. Peri-prosthetic fractures were not observed. We report excellent results with respect to subsidence, the risk of fracture, and loosening after femoral revision using a modular curved revision stem with distal cone-in-cone fixation. A successful outcome depends on careful pre-operative planning and the use of a transfemoral approach when the anatomy is distorted or a fracture is imminent, or residual cement or a partially-secured existing stem cannot be removed. The shortest appropriate stem should, in our opinion, be used and secured with > 3 cm fixation at the femoral isthmus, and distal interlocking screws should be used for additional stability when this goal cannot be realised.
我们报告了使用 Revitan 弯曲模块化钛制开槽revision 柄在各种类型股骨近端缺损的患者中进行翻修全髋关节置换术 (THR) 的经验。共有 112 名患者 (116 例翻修) 纳入研究,平均年龄 73.4 岁 (39 至 90 岁)。平均随访时间为 7.5 年 (5.3 至 9.1 年)。共有 12 名患者 (12 髋) 死亡,但他们的数据纳入了生存分析,4 名患者 (4 髋) 失访。对 101 髋进行了临床结果、近端骨再生和下沉评估。5 年后 Harris 髋关节评分平均为 88.2 (45.8 至 100),Barnett 和 Nordin 评分 (近端骨再生的测量指标) 平均增加 20.8 (3.1 至 52.7)。5 个柄需要翻修 (4.3%),3 个出现下沉 (2.9%),5 个脱位 (4.3%),85 例无菌翻修中有 2 例 (2.3%) 发生假体周围感染。在最新随访时,以翻修柄作为终点的生存率为 95.7% (95%置信区间 91.9%至 99.4%),以无菌性松动作为终点的生存率为 100%。未观察到假体周围骨折。我们报告了使用带远端圆锥-圆锥固定的模块化弯曲 revision 柄进行股骨翻修后在下沉、骨折风险和松动方面的出色结果。成功的结果取决于术前的仔细规划,以及在解剖结构变形或即将发生骨折时使用经股骨入路,或者无法取出残留水泥或部分固定的现有柄时。我们认为,应使用最短合适的柄,并在股骨峡部获得 >3cm 的固定,当无法实现这一目标时,应使用远端锁定螺钉以增加稳定性。