• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双颌前突拔牙矫治中前牙整体后移与分步后移的对比

En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.

作者信息

Felemban Nayef H, Al-Sulaimani Fahad F, Murshid Zuhair A, Hassan Ali H

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Dental Center, Al Noor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Preventive Dental Science, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Orthod Sci. 2013 Jan;2(1):28-37. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.110330.

DOI:10.4103/2278-0203.110330
PMID:24987640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4072371/
Abstract

In the present report, two techniques of space closure; two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) and en masse retraction (ER) were used in two adult patients who had bimaxillary protrusion and were treated with four premolar extractions and fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Both patients had a Class I dental malocclusion and the same chief complaint, which is protrusive lips. Anterior teeth were retracted by two-step retraction; canine sliding followed by retraction of incisors with T-loop archwire in the first patient and by en masse retraction using Beta titanium alloy T-loop archwire in the second case. At the end of treatment, good balance and harmony of lips was achieved with maintenance of Class I relationships. The outcome of treatment was similar in the two patients with similar anchorage control. ER can be an acceptable alternative to the TSR during space closure since it is esthetically more acceptable. However, it requires accurate bending and positioning of the T-loop.

摘要

在本报告中,对两名双颌前突的成年患者采用了两种间隙关闭技术,即两步前牙后移(TSR)和整体后移(ER),这两名患者均接受了拔除四颗前磨牙及固定正畸矫治器治疗。两名患者均为安氏Ⅰ类错牙合,主诉相同,即嘴唇前突。第一名患者通过两步后移法后移前牙,即先拉尖牙滑动,然后用T形曲弓丝内收切牙;第二名患者则使用β钛合金T形曲弓丝通过整体后移法内收前牙。治疗结束时,在维持安氏Ⅰ类关系的同时,实现了唇部良好的平衡与协调。在类似的支抗控制下,两名患者的治疗效果相似。在间隙关闭过程中,整体后移法作为两步前牙后移法的替代方法是可以接受的,因为它在美学上更易被接受。然而,这需要对T形曲进行精确的弯制和定位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/0e7e9908320a/JOS-2-28-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/de3b8bb0024a/JOS-2-28-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/f5d1588d8c03/JOS-2-28-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/54fe09e7ecb7/JOS-2-28-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/099eed9bcc7f/JOS-2-28-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/b4d678cd3b79/JOS-2-28-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/0bffbff94d87/JOS-2-28-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/8f6b5983dc01/JOS-2-28-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/65c18dc8ced3/JOS-2-28-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/8682ddd20381/JOS-2-28-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/9a900149ada8/JOS-2-28-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/3307bcf98962/JOS-2-28-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/8322616925db/JOS-2-28-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/96efd1e83692/JOS-2-28-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/aa4a87f31ffb/JOS-2-28-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/572468c5b327/JOS-2-28-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/f929fb90f313/JOS-2-28-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/0e7e9908320a/JOS-2-28-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/de3b8bb0024a/JOS-2-28-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/f5d1588d8c03/JOS-2-28-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/54fe09e7ecb7/JOS-2-28-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/099eed9bcc7f/JOS-2-28-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/b4d678cd3b79/JOS-2-28-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/0bffbff94d87/JOS-2-28-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/8f6b5983dc01/JOS-2-28-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/65c18dc8ced3/JOS-2-28-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/8682ddd20381/JOS-2-28-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/9a900149ada8/JOS-2-28-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/3307bcf98962/JOS-2-28-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/8322616925db/JOS-2-28-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/96efd1e83692/JOS-2-28-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/aa4a87f31ffb/JOS-2-28-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/572468c5b327/JOS-2-28-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/f929fb90f313/JOS-2-28-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e1/4072371/0e7e9908320a/JOS-2-28-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.双颌前突拔牙矫治中前牙整体后移与分步后移的对比
J Orthod Sci. 2013 Jan;2(1):28-37. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.110330.
2
En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.成人上颌或双颌牙牙槽突前突患者上前牙整体后缩:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):113-127.
3
Friction versus frictionless mechanics during maxillary en-masse retraction in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a randomized clinical trial.上颌骨整体后退治疗 I 类双颌前突成人患者时的摩擦力与无摩擦力机制:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Aug 1;46(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae034.
4
Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.与传统支抗两步法内收相比,微型种植体支抗整体内收对安氏II类1分类错牙合患者疗效变化的评估:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
5
Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.与传统支抗两步法内收相比,临时骨锚式装置内收治疗牙列牙槽突前突患者的疗效评估:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):513-523. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_661_18.
6
Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction: A randomized prospective clinical trial.整体快速后移与两步后退法在拔牙病例中前牙内收和支抗控制的比较:一项随机前瞻性临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):190-199. doi: 10.2319/051518-363.1. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?使用微螺钉支持的整体远移矫治Ⅱ类2分类错牙合:深覆牙合真的是拔牙治疗的障碍吗?
Turk J Orthod. 2017 Sep;30(3):84-88. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17034. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Effect of low-level laser therapy on en masse retraction in females with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion : A single-center randomized clinical trial.低强度激光治疗对双颌牙牙槽突女性整体回缩的影响:一项单中心随机临床试验。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00525-2.
9
Effectiveness of low-intensity electrical current in accelerating the en-masse retraction of the upper anterior teeth following first-premolar extraction in young adult patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial.低强度电流对加速拔除第一前磨牙的恒牙早期安氏II类1分类错牙合患者上前牙整体后移的有效性:一项随机对照临床试验
Int Orthod. 2024 Dec;22(4):100921. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100921. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
10
An Evaluation of the Rate and Type of Orthodontic Tooth Movement When Injecting Platelet-Rich Plasma During Mini-Implant-Based Segmented en-Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth.在上颌前牙基于微型种植体的分段整体后移过程中注射富血小板血浆时正畸牙齿移动的速率和类型评估
Cureus. 2024 Jun 14;16(6):e62368. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62368. eCollection 2024 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Root Resorption Following en Masse Retraction: A Prospective Assessment of Nickel-Titanium Closed-Coil Springs and Elastomeric Chains.整体内收后的牙根吸收:镍钛闭合圈弹簧与弹力链的前瞻性评估
Cureus. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):e86857. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86857. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic En-Bloc Retraction Comparing Compound Technique and Sliding Mechanics Using a HOSEA Robotic Device.使用HOSEA机器人装置比较复合技术和滑动机制的正畸整体内收的生物力学模拟
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Feb 2;11(2):153. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11020153.
3
What Is the Most Effective Frictionless Method for Retracting Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study.三种正畸丝的物理、机械和弯曲性能:一项体外研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.032.
2
Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.随机临床试验比较两种后牵引技术对上颌支抗控制的效果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.027.
3
Apical root resorption in orthodontic patients with en-masse maxillary anterior retraction and intrusion with miniscrews.
在使用颊侧固定矫治器治疗时,内收前牙最有效的无摩擦方法是什么?一项系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 30;13(1):231. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010231.
4
How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review.在使用颊侧固定矫治器治疗时,与滑动技术相比,非摩擦技术在上颌前牙内收方面的效果如何?一项系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 25;12(21):6757. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216757.
5
Comparison of the effectiveness of piezocision-aided canine retraction augmented with micro-osteoperforation: a randomized controlled trial.微骨孔增强的超声骨刀辅助尖牙内收的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;94(1):17-24. doi: 10.2319/052323-370.1.
6
Effect of piezocision corticotomy on en-masse retraction.骨切开术对整体回缩的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Sep 1;90(5):648-654. doi: 10.2319/092719-615.1.
7
Nonextraction Management of Severely Malaligned and Constricted Upper Arch.严重牙列不齐且上颌弓狭窄的非拔牙矫治
Case Rep Dent. 2020 Aug 25;2020:8836061. doi: 10.1155/2020/8836061. eCollection 2020.
8
Which one closes extraction spaces faster: en masse retraction or two-step retraction? .大量回收与两步回收,哪种方法关闭拔牙间隙更快?
Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):855-861. doi: 10.2319/101618-748.1. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
9
En masse versus two-step retraction of the anterior segment.前段的整块与两步回缩法
Evid Based Dent. 2018 Dec;19(4):111-112. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401343.
10
Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction: A randomized prospective clinical trial.整体快速后移与两步后退法在拔牙病例中前牙内收和支抗控制的比较:一项随机前瞻性临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):190-199. doi: 10.2319/051518-363.1. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
正畸患者上颌前牙整体内收和压低时应用微螺钉支抗后牙牙槽骨吸收
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.027.
4
Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.传统磨牙支抗与钛种植体支抗在犬牙后移速率方面的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.044.
5
En masse retraction and two-step retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in adult Class I women. A comparison of anchorage loss.成年I类女性上颌前牙的整体后移和两步法后移。支抗丧失的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):973-8. doi: 10.2319/111706-464.1.
6
Zygomatic anchorage for en masse retraction in the treatment of severe Class II division 1.颧部支抗用于严重安氏II类1分类错牙合的整体远中移动矫治
Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):483-90. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[483:ZAFEMR]2.0.CO;2.
7
Rationale of the segmented arch.分段式牙弓的原理。
Am J Orthod. 1962 Nov;48:805-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(62)90001-5.
8
Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method.人类下颌骨生长模式的变异:通过种植体方法进行的纵向影像学研究
J Dent Res. 1963 Jan-Feb;42(1)Pt 2:400-11. doi: 10.1177/00220345630420014701.
9
Testing force systems and biomechanics--measured tooth movements from differential moment closing loops.测试力系统与生物力学——差动矩闭合环测量的牙齿移动
Angle Orthod. 2003 Jun;73(3):270-80. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0270:TFSABT>2.0.CO;2.
10
On the management of extraction sites.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Dec;112(6):645-55. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70230-0.