Angle Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;94(1):17-24. doi: 10.2319/052323-370.1.
To evaluate the effectiveness of micro-osteoperforation (MOP) on the rate of piezocision-aided canine retraction (CR).
The split-mouth study included 25 participants at the stage of commencing CR. The participants received flapless piezocision bilaterally at T0 (0 months) and MOP only on one side at T3 (3 months). The quadrant that received MOP at T3 served as the intervention, whereas the other quadrant served as the control. The primary outcome was the rate of CR, assessed using digital models. The angular change (AC) of the canine and the change in the buccal cortical bone thickness (BCBT) from before to after CR were also assessed using cone beam computed tomography.
The rate of CR was 0.82 ± 0.39 mm/month in the control quadrant vs 0.75 ± 0.44 mm/month in the intervention quadrant (P > .05). The AC of the canine was 2.00° ± 0.88° in the control quadrant vs 1.98° ± 0.86° in the intervention quadrant (P > .05). The crestal bone gain was 0.50 mm in the control quadrant vs 0.28 mm of bone loss in the intervention quadrant. The bone thickness at a 3-mm height was increased by 0.11 mm in the control quadrant vs a 0.29-mm decrease in the intervention quadrant. The bone thickness at a 6-mm height was decreased by 0.12 mm in the control quadrant vs a 0.15-mm decrease in the intervention quadrant. However, none of the changes or group differences in bone height or thickness were statistically significant (P > .05).
The periodic activation of a piezocision-aided CR site using MOP had no significant positive effect on the rate of CR, angulation of the canine, or changes in BCBT.
评估微骨穿孔术(MOP)对辅助压槽法尖牙后移(CR)速率的影响。
这项分侧研究纳入了 25 名处于 CR 起始阶段的参与者。在 T0(0 个月)时,所有参与者双侧接受无瓣超声骨刀辅助压槽法,在 T3(3 个月)时仅单侧接受 MOP。在 T3 时接受 MOP 的象限作为干预侧,而另一侧作为对照侧。主要结局是使用数字模型评估 CR 速率。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估尖牙的角度变化(AC)和 CR 前后颊侧皮质骨厚度(BCBT)的变化。
在对照组,CR 速率为 0.82±0.39mm/月,在干预组为 0.75±0.44mm/月(P>0.05)。对照组尖牙的 AC 为 2.00°±0.88°,干预组为 1.98°±0.86°(P>0.05)。对照组颊侧骨获得 0.50mm,干预组颊侧骨损失 0.28mm。对照组 3mm 高度处的骨厚度增加了 0.11mm,干预组减少了 0.29mm。对照组 6mm 高度处的骨厚度减少了 0.12mm,干预组减少了 0.15mm。然而,骨高度或厚度的任何变化或组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
周期性激活辅助压槽法 CR 部位的 MOP 对 CR 速率、尖牙角度或 BCBT 的变化没有显著的积极影响。