Suppr超能文献

早期宫颈癌腹式根治性宫颈切除术与子宫切除术的手术及病理结果

Surgical and pathological outcomes of abdominal radical trachelectomy versus hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

作者信息

Zhang Dandan, Li Jin, Ge Huijuan, Ju Xingzhu, Chen Xiaojun, Tang Jia, Wu Xiaohua

机构信息

Departments of *Gynecologic Oncology and †Pathology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China; and ‡Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Sep;24(7):1312-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000185.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the surgical and pathological outcomes for patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH).

METHODS

A prospective database of ART and ARH procedures performed in a standardized manner by the same surgical group was analyzed. The 3-segment technique was used for the accurate analysis of parametrial lymph nodes (PMLNs), and parametrial measurements were recorded by the same pathologist. Standard statistical tests were used.

RESULT

Between August 2012 and August 2013, ART was attempted in 39 patients (28.6%), and ARH was attempted in 90 patients (71.4%). The parametrium resection length was similar with ART and ARH (44.60 vs 45.48 mm, P = 0.432), as were additional surgical and pathological outcomes, including histology, lymph node positive rate, and operation time. The PMLNs were found in 28 patients (77.78%) in the ART group and in 86 (95.56%) in the ARH group (P > 0.05). Solitary PMLN metastases were observed in 3 patients (10.71%) in the ART group and in 6 (6.98%) in the ARH group. Five (55.6%) of these 9 patients had tumors of 2 cm or greater. The ARH patients (36, 40.00%) were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy or radiation compared with ART patients (13, 33.33%; P = 0.017). At a median follow-up of 12 and 12.5 months (P = 0.063), respectively, there were no recurrences or deaths in the ART or ARH groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Using standardized techniques, ART provides similar surgical and pathological outcomes as ARH. For the patients with tumors of 2 cm or greater, PMLNs should be examined carefully. Further prospective data are urgently needed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较早期宫颈癌患者行腹式根治性宫颈切除术(ART)和腹式根治性子宫切除术(ARH)后的手术及病理结果。

方法

分析由同一手术团队以标准化方式进行的ART和ARH手术的前瞻性数据库。采用三段技术对宫旁淋巴结(PMLNs)进行精确分析,且由同一位病理学家记录宫旁测量数据。使用标准统计检验。

结果

2012年8月至2013年8月期间,39例患者(28.6%)尝试行ART,90例患者(71.4%)尝试行ARH。ART和ARH的宫旁切除长度相似(44.60对45.48毫米,P = 0.432),其他手术及病理结果,包括组织学、淋巴结阳性率和手术时间也相似。ART组28例患者(77.78%)发现有PMLNs,ARH组86例患者(95.56%)发现有PMLNs(P>0.05)。ART组3例患者(10.71%)观察到孤立性PMLN转移,ARH组6例患者(6.98%)观察到孤立性PMLN转移。这9例患者中有5例(55.6%)肿瘤直径达2厘米或更大。与ART患者(13例,33.33%)相比,ARH患者(36例,40.00%)更有可能接受术后化疗或放疗(P = 0.017)。分别进行12个月和12.5个月的中位随访(P = 0.063)时,ART组或ARH组均无复发或死亡病例。

结论

采用标准化技术,ART与ARH的手术及病理结果相似。对于肿瘤直径达2厘米或更大的患者,应仔细检查PMLNs。迫切需要进一步的前瞻性数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验