Suppr超能文献

防止护理教育中作弊行为的学术政策与措施

Academic policies and practices to deter cheating in nursing education.

作者信息

Stonecypher Karen, Willson Pamela

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):167-79. doi: 10.5480/12-1028.1.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the evidence available to facilitate nursing faculty in policy development and implementation of strategies to deter cheating.

BACKGROUND

No previous comprehensive summary of successful faculty practices was found in the literature on which to base academic practice.

METHODS

A search of six databases was undertaken using the combination of terms: nursing and policy, nursing and student misconduct, nursing and cheating, and nursing and integrity. More than 28,000 publications were reviewed for English language, US higher education system, and health care programs. Excluded articles described bioethical and research misconduct, admission policy, or workforce issues.

RESULTS

Forty-three articles met criteria; a matrix table lists specific faculty action plans and deterrent strategies by category of misconduct for each publication.

CONCLUSION

Clearly defined behaviors, processes, and consequences should be delineated by school policies to guide implementation of specific cheating deterrent strategies.

摘要

目的

本系统文献综述的目的是评估现有证据,以帮助护理教师制定政策并实施防止作弊的策略。

背景

在文献中未发现以前有关于成功教师做法的全面总结可作为学术实践的基础。

方法

使用“护理与政策”“护理与学生不当行为”“护理与作弊”以及“护理与诚信”等术语组合对六个数据库进行搜索。对超过28000篇英文出版物进行了审查,涉及美国高等教育系统和医疗保健项目。排除描述生物伦理和研究不当行为、招生政策或劳动力问题的文章。

结果

43篇文章符合标准;一个矩阵表按不当行为类别列出了每种出版物的具体教师行动计划和威慑策略。

结论

学校政策应明确界定行为、流程和后果,以指导实施具体的作弊威慑策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验