Stonecypher Karen, Willson Pamela
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):167-79. doi: 10.5480/12-1028.1.
The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the evidence available to facilitate nursing faculty in policy development and implementation of strategies to deter cheating.
No previous comprehensive summary of successful faculty practices was found in the literature on which to base academic practice.
A search of six databases was undertaken using the combination of terms: nursing and policy, nursing and student misconduct, nursing and cheating, and nursing and integrity. More than 28,000 publications were reviewed for English language, US higher education system, and health care programs. Excluded articles described bioethical and research misconduct, admission policy, or workforce issues.
Forty-three articles met criteria; a matrix table lists specific faculty action plans and deterrent strategies by category of misconduct for each publication.
Clearly defined behaviors, processes, and consequences should be delineated by school policies to guide implementation of specific cheating deterrent strategies.
本系统文献综述的目的是评估现有证据,以帮助护理教师制定政策并实施防止作弊的策略。
在文献中未发现以前有关于成功教师做法的全面总结可作为学术实践的基础。
使用“护理与政策”“护理与学生不当行为”“护理与作弊”以及“护理与诚信”等术语组合对六个数据库进行搜索。对超过28000篇英文出版物进行了审查,涉及美国高等教育系统和医疗保健项目。排除描述生物伦理和研究不当行为、招生政策或劳动力问题的文章。
43篇文章符合标准;一个矩阵表按不当行为类别列出了每种出版物的具体教师行动计划和威慑策略。
学校政策应明确界定行为、流程和后果,以指导实施具体的作弊威慑策略。