Suppr超能文献

远程学习中学术角色与制度变革的十二条建议。

Twelve tips for academic role and institutional change in distance learning.

作者信息

Delgaty Laura

机构信息

Newcastle University , United Kingdom.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2015 Jan;37(1):41-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.932900. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the uptake of distance learning (DL), which has been marginal for most clinical academics, teaching contexts, traditional power structures and relationships have changed, leaving lecturers potentially disenfranchised. DL has caused a distinct change in academic roles, but academic and institutional routines have remained unchanged. Information surrounding the changes is confusing and lacks clear guidance.

AIM

To provide a pragmatic outline of roles, responsibilities, obstacles and solutions for clinical academics involved in DL.

METHOD

A two-year action research project was carried out examining the academic role when developing and delivering a 20 credit post graduate DL module in Clinical Education at Newcastle University. It entailed three strands which were "active" for two weeks at a time in which all activities had to be completed. Sixteen students participated in the module consisting of independent activities, facilitated discussion forums, wikis, required reading, individual and group tasks. Pedagogically, it was based on heavily on Garrison's (2012) and Salmon's (2008) work on constructivism and online communities.

RESULTS

Institutions need a clear plan and a change of culture. Roles have emerged including: administrator, manager, team leader knowledge expert, moderator and facilitator.

CONCLUSIONS

Universities struggle to engage staff with DL due to its unrecognised and (many academics believe) unsustainable workload. These 12 tips provide academics and managers involved in clinical education with clear guidance surrounding strategies that inform practice. New roles have emerged, work habits must be revolutionised and changes in routine must be addressed.

摘要

背景

随着远程学习(DL)的兴起,对于大多数临床学者而言,远程学习在教学环境、传统权力结构和关系中一直处于边缘地位,这使得讲师可能被剥夺权利。远程学习已导致学术角色发生明显变化,但学术和机构惯例却保持不变。有关这些变化的信息令人困惑,且缺乏明确的指导。

目的

为参与远程学习的临床学者提供一份关于角色、职责、障碍和解决方案的实用概述。

方法

开展了一项为期两年的行动研究项目,研究在纽卡斯尔大学开发和提供一个20学分的临床教育研究生远程学习模块时的学术角色。该项目包括三个环节,每次“活跃”两周,所有活动都必须在此期间完成。16名学生参与了该模块,其中包括独立活动、促进讨论的论坛、维基、必读材料、个人和小组任务。从教学角度来看,该项目很大程度上基于加里森(2012年)和萨尔蒙(2008年)关于建构主义和在线社区的研究。

结果

机构需要一个明确的计划和文化变革。出现的角色包括:管理员、经理、团队领导、知识专家、主持人和促进者。

结论

由于远程学习的工作量未得到认可(许多学者认为)且不可持续,大学难以让员工参与其中。这12条建议为参与临床教育的学者和管理人员提供了有关指导实践策略的明确指导。新角色已经出现,工作习惯必须彻底改变,常规变化必须得到解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验