McKee Kathleen E, Hackney Madeleine E
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Atlanta Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation R&D Center of Excellence for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta, GA, USA Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014 Jan 1;35(2):279-89. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141122.
In Parkinson's disease (PD), motor and cognitive impairments interact to affect functional performance adversely. A valid mobility test, the Four Square Step Test (FSST) involves multidirectional stepping over obstacles. FSST performance may also be associated with cognitive performance.
This study determined the feasibility and reliability of an obstacle-based FSST in older individuals with versus without PD, and evaluated the association of PD performance of FSST with tests of cognition.
Thirty-one individuals with mild-moderate PD, evaluated while ON medications, completed the obstacle-based FSST, other mobility and cognitive measures. FSST performance was compared between a PD participant sub-set (n = 24) and 24 age-matched older adults. Data were analyzed with independent t-tests, correlations, and linear regression.
Obstacle-based FSST was feasible and reliable within sessions in those with PD. Median best FSST time among individuals with PD was 11.72 s (9.99, 13.98) and FSST had concurrent validity with tests of mobility, and cognitive dual-tasking. Among cognitive tests, Trails Making Test B, which evaluates executive function, emerged as a sole contributor (49%) of variance. FSST performance did not differ between those with PD and older adults.
The obstacle-based FSST is feasible and reliable in those with PD. The relationship between cognitive status and performance on the FSST did not appear to be strongly disease-stage dependent. Using FSST in the clinic may help assess the health status of a motor-cognitive interaction in individuals with PD.
在帕金森病(PD)中,运动和认知障碍相互作用,对功能表现产生不利影响。一种有效的移动性测试,四方步测试(FSST)涉及在障碍物上进行多方向的跨步。FSST表现也可能与认知表现相关。
本研究确定了基于障碍物的FSST在有和没有PD的老年人中的可行性和可靠性,并评估了FSST的PD表现与认知测试之间的关联。
31名轻度至中度PD患者在服药状态下接受评估,完成了基于障碍物的FSST、其他移动性和认知测量。将PD参与者子集(n = 24)与24名年龄匹配的老年人的FSST表现进行比较。数据采用独立t检验、相关性分析和线性回归进行分析。
基于障碍物的FSST在PD患者的各次测试中是可行且可靠的。PD患者中最佳FSST时间的中位数为11.72秒(9.99,13.98),FSST与移动性测试和认知双重任务测试具有同时效度。在认知测试中,评估执行功能的连线测验B是方差的唯一贡献因素(49%)。PD患者和老年人的FSST表现没有差异。
基于障碍物的FSST在PD患者中是可行且可靠的。FSST表现与认知状态之间的关系似乎并不强烈依赖于疾病阶段。在临床中使用FSST可能有助于评估PD患者运动-认知相互作用的健康状况。