Ott Julien G, Becce Fabio, Monnin Pascal, Schmidt Sabine, Bochud François O, Verdun Francis R
Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Grand-Pré, 1-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Aug 7;59(15):4047-64. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/4/4047. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
The state of the art to describe image quality in medical imaging is to assess the performance of an observer conducting a task of clinical interest. This can be done by using a model observer leading to a figure of merit such as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Using the non-prewhitening (NPW) model observer, we objectively characterised the evolution of its figure of merit in various acquisition conditions. The NPW model observer usually requires the use of the modulation transfer function (MTF) as well as noise power spectra. However, although the computation of the MTF poses no problem when dealing with the traditional filtered back-projection (FBP) algorithm, this is not the case when using iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms, such as adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) or model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Given that the target transfer function (TTF) had already shown it could accurately express the system resolution even with non-linear algorithms, we decided to tune the NPW model observer, replacing the standard MTF by the TTF. It was estimated using a custom-made phantom containing cylindrical inserts surrounded by water. The contrast differences between the inserts and water were plotted for each acquisition condition. Then, mathematical transformations were performed leading to the TTF. As expected, the first results showed a dependency of the image contrast and noise levels on the TTF for both ASIR and MBIR. Moreover, FBP also proved to be dependent of the contrast and noise when using the lung kernel. Those results were then introduced in the NPW model observer. We observed an enhancement of SNR every time we switched from FBP to ASIR to MBIR. IR algorithms greatly improve image quality, especially in low-dose conditions. Based on our results, the use of MBIR could lead to further dose reduction in several clinical applications.
医学成像中描述图像质量的最新技术是评估执行具有临床意义任务的观察者的表现。这可以通过使用模型观察者来实现,从而得出诸如信噪比(SNR)之类的品质因数。使用非白化(NPW)模型观察者,我们客观地表征了其品质因数在各种采集条件下的演变。NPW模型观察者通常需要使用调制传递函数(MTF)以及噪声功率谱。然而,尽管在处理传统的滤波反投影(FBP)算法时MTF的计算没有问题,但在使用迭代重建(IR)算法时情况并非如此,例如自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR)或基于模型的迭代重建(MBIR)。鉴于目标传递函数(TTF)已经表明即使使用非线性算法也能准确表达系统分辨率,我们决定调整NPW模型观察者,用TTF代替标准MTF。它是使用一个定制的体模进行估计的,该体模包含被水包围的圆柱形插入物。针对每种采集条件绘制插入物与水之间的对比度差异。然后进行数学变换以得到TTF。正如预期的那样,初步结果表明,对于ASIR和MBIR,图像对比度和噪声水平都依赖于TTF。此外,在使用肺内核时,FBP也被证明依赖于对比度和噪声。然后将这些结果引入NPW模型观察者中。我们观察到,每次从FBP切换到ASIR再到MBIR时,SNR都会提高。IR算法极大地提高了图像质量,尤其是在低剂量条件下。基于我们的结果,在一些临床应用中使用MBIR可能会进一步降低剂量。