Litta P, Leggieri C, Conte L, Dalla Toffola A, Multinu F, Angioni S
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(3):335-8.
The authors' aim is to compare surgical outcome of hysteroscopic G1 and G2 submucous myomectomy using bipolar resectoscope to those performed by monopolar device.
a multicenter-observational-case-control study was conducted on premenopausal women affected by menorrhagia, pelvic pain or infertility because of submucous uterine myoma. The authors considered eligible: single G1 or G2 submucous uterine myoma, at least 0.5 cm ultrasound 'myometrial-free-margin' and two months GnRH pre-surgical treatment (myoma > three cm). Goup A patients were treated b y bipolar resectoscope and Group B by monopolar resectoscope. Primary endpoint was to compare the groups in term of complete or incomplete myomas resection ("second-step-procedure" rate). Secondary endpoint was to compare two treatments in term of surgical time and intraoperative complications rate.
Group A (60 patients) and Group B (216 patients) were homogeneous for general features and myomas location but they differed for G2 type prevalence (73.3% vs 50.5%), mean myomas diameter (33.17 +/- 11.93 vs 29.45 +/- 9.63), and surgical time (29.43 +/- 12.6 vs 23.2 +/- 8.2 minutes). In Group A patients both G1 and G2 myomas were completely removed in single step without intraoperative/postoperative complications; in Group B surgical outcomes of G1 myomas were similar to those of Group A, while G2 myomas required procedure termination in 12% of cases because of light electrolyte disturbance (22 cases) and severe iponatremia in four cases. All intraoperative complications occurred when procedure time exceeded 30 minutes and when myomas diameter was greater than 37.5 millimeters.
in the era ofmini-invasive surgery, hysteroscopic approach by bipolar device should be considered as a useful, safe, and large scale feasible procedure for submucosal myoma treatment, particularly when G2.
作者旨在比较使用双极电切镜与单极设备进行宫腔镜下G1和G2型黏膜下子宫肌瘤切除术的手术效果。
对因黏膜下子宫肌瘤导致月经过多、盆腔疼痛或不孕的绝经前女性进行了一项多中心观察性病例对照研究。作者认为符合条件的为:单个G1或G2型黏膜下子宫肌瘤,超声显示“肌层无切缘”至少0.5 cm,术前两个月进行GnRH治疗(肌瘤>3 cm)。A组患者采用双极电切镜治疗,B组采用单极电切镜治疗。主要终点是比较两组完全或不完全肌瘤切除情况(“第二步手术”率)。次要终点是比较两种治疗方法的手术时间和术中并发症发生率。
A组(60例患者)和B组(216例患者)在一般特征和肌瘤位置方面具有同质性,但在G2型患病率(73.3%对50.5%)、肌瘤平均直径(33.17±11.93对29.45±9.63)和手术时间(29.43±12.6对23.2±8.2分钟)方面存在差异。A组患者的G1和G2肌瘤均在一步手术中完全切除,无术中/术后并发症;B组G1肌瘤的手术效果与A组相似,而G2肌瘤在12%的病例中因轻度电解质紊乱(22例)和4例严重低钠血症而需要终止手术。所有术中并发症均发生在手术时间超过30分钟且肌瘤直径大于37.5毫米时。
在微创手术时代,双极设备的宫腔镜手术应被视为一种治疗黏膜下肌瘤有用、安全且大规模可行的方法,尤其是对于G2型肌瘤。