Wroblewski B A, Glenn M B, Whyte J, Singer W D
Greenery Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center, Boston, MA.
Brain Inj. 1989 Apr-Jun;3(2):149-56. doi: 10.3109/02699058909004546.
Most patients who receive anticonvulsants after traumatic brain injury are treated with the sedative anticonvulsants phenytoin and/or phenobarbital, or perhaps primidone. However, there is considerable evidence demonstrating that these medications have a deleterious effect on cognitive function. Thus, in a rehabilitation setting, alternatives should be sought. Carbamazepine has been found to be relatively free of such effects, and would be an optimum alternative if seizure control were comparable. We have studied the effects of withdrawing phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone, and using carbamazepine as the primary anticonvulsant in 27 patients at the Greenery Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center for whom ongoing anticonvulsant treatment was considered to be necessary due to previous seizures or a high risk of the occurrence of seizure. We compared a 3 month baseline period (just prior to carbamazepine introduction or sedative anticonvulsant tapering), to a 3 month post-withdrawal period immediately following sedative anticonvulsant withdrawal, when carbamazepine was the sole anticonvulsant. In 20 out of 21 patients in whom carbamazepine replaced sedative anticonvulsants seizure control was essentially similar or somewhat improved. In only one patient did the substitution with carbamazepine result in a loss of seizure control. Six patients were initially receiving carbamazepine in combination with phenytoin and/or phenobarbital. The removal of phenytoin and phenobarbital, leaving carbamazepine as sole therapy, resulted in improved seizure control in three patients and no change in the other three. In the light of carbamazepine's reportedly less detrimental effects on cognitive function and behaviour in other patient populations, it should perhaps be considered as a first line anticonvulsant, especially for patients in rehabilitation settings.
大多数创伤性脑损伤后接受抗惊厥药物治疗的患者使用镇静性抗惊厥药物苯妥英和/或苯巴比妥,或者可能使用扑米酮进行治疗。然而,有大量证据表明这些药物对认知功能有有害影响。因此,在康复环境中,应寻求替代药物。已发现卡马西平相对没有此类影响,如果癫痫控制效果相当,它将是一个最佳替代药物。我们在绿园康复和熟练护理中心对27例患者进行了研究,这些患者因既往癫痫发作或癫痫发作风险高而被认为有必要持续进行抗惊厥治疗,研究内容为停用苯妥英、苯巴比妥和扑米酮,并将卡马西平作为主要抗惊厥药物使用的效果。我们将3个月的基线期(就在引入卡马西平或逐渐减少镇静性抗惊厥药物用量之前)与镇静性抗惊厥药物停用后紧接着的3个月撤药后期进行了比较,撤药后期卡马西平是唯一的抗惊厥药物。在21例用卡马西平替代镇静性抗惊厥药物的患者中,有20例癫痫控制基本相似或有所改善。只有1例患者用卡马西平替代后癫痫控制不佳。6例患者最初接受卡马西平与苯妥英和/或苯巴比妥联合治疗。停用苯妥英和苯巴比妥,仅保留卡马西平作为唯一治疗药物,结果3例患者的癫痫控制得到改善,另外3例患者无变化。鉴于据报道卡马西平对其他患者群体的认知功能和行为的有害影响较小,或许应将其视为一线抗惊厥药物,尤其是对于康复环境中的患者。