Sadeghi Hasan, Hajloo Nader, Babayi Karim, Shahri Maryam
Young Researchers Club and Elites, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Ardabil, Iran.
Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, School of Education and Psychology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.
Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2014 Spring;8(1):42-50.
The aim of the current study is to investigate the relationship between metacognition and obsessive beliefs, and procrastination.
285 students of Tabriz and Mohaghegh Ardabili Universities, Iran, were selected by random sampling, and completed the metacognition (MCQ-30) questionnaire, obsessive beliefs questionnaire (OBQ-44), and General Procrastination Scale. The research method was descriptive. Data was implemented by structural equation modeling, using Amos software (version 19) and Anderson and Greenberg's (1988) two-step approach was followed. First, the model measurement, and then the structural model were examined.
RESULTS showed that obsessive beliefs and metacognitive beliefs, directly and indirectly, predict the behavior of procrastination. Cognitive confidence, need for control of thoughts, and positive beliefs about worry from metacognitive beliefs were positively and significantly correlated with procrastination. In addition, cognitive self-consciousness was inversely correlated with procrastination. Perfectionism/certainty from obsessive beliefs was inversely correlated with procrastination. Moreover, the relationship between obsessive beliefs and metacognitive beliefs were positive and significant.
Our findings show a significant relationship between obsessive and metacognitive beliefs and procrastination. To reduce behaviors of procrastination, control of obsessive beliefs and metacognition seems to be necessary. Moreover, controlling and shaping metacognitive beliefs can be effective in reducing compulsive behavior.
None.
本研究旨在探讨元认知与强迫观念及拖延之间的关系。
通过随机抽样选取了伊朗大不里士大学和莫哈格赫·阿尔达比勒大学的285名学生,他们完成了元认知(MCQ - 30)问卷、强迫观念问卷(OBQ - 44)和一般拖延量表。研究方法为描述性研究。数据采用结构方程模型进行分析,使用Amos软件(版本19),并遵循安德森和格林伯格(1988)的两步法。首先检验模型测量,然后检验结构模型。
结果表明,强迫观念和元认知信念直接或间接预测拖延行为。认知信心、对思维控制的需求以及元认知信念中对担忧的积极信念与拖延呈显著正相关。此外,认知自我意识与拖延呈负相关。强迫观念中的完美主义/确定性与拖延呈负相关。而且,强迫观念与元认知信念之间的关系呈显著正相关。
我们的研究结果表明强迫观念和元认知信念与拖延之间存在显著关系。为减少拖延行为,控制强迫观念和元认知似乎是必要的。此外,控制和塑造元认知信念可能对减少强迫行为有效。
无。