Singh Sandeep, Gupta Aarzoo, Singh Gurvinder Pal
Department of Psychiatry, Punjab Institute of Medical Sciences, Jalandhar, Punjab, India.
Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;65(11):1158-1164. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_633_23. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
Decision-making (DM) is simply choosing among alternatives or defining one's course of action. A depressed individual does not perceive himself as a decision-maker as ruminations reinforce dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and poor executive functioning. The aim was to study and compare the relationship among DM, metacognition, and executive functioning in those with recurrent depressive disorder (RDD) and in healthy controls (HCs).
A cross-sectional comparative group study design was used with a sample size of 40, with 20 participants in each group. The tools used were Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, General Health Questionnaire, Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire, Metacognitive Questionnaire, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test.
The RDD group had significantly higher scores on buck-passing (BP), procrastination (PR), hypervigilance, and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs, and poor performance on executive functioning than HC. PR was inversely correlated with executive functioning and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs in the RDD group, whereas in the HC group, BP was positively correlated with executive functioning and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs.
DM has a significant relationship with executive functions and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs; therefore, changes in any one variable contribute to changes in the other two. The altered attentional and executive control due to dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs leads to poor DM, resulting in psychosocial dysfunction. The underlying metacognitive beliefs and executive functioning play a crucial role in DM, the process determining psychosocial functioning.
决策(DM)就是在备选方案中进行选择或确定自己的行动方针。抑郁个体并不认为自己是决策者,因为反复思考会强化功能失调的元认知信念和较差的执行功能。本研究旨在探讨和比较复发性抑郁症(RDD)患者和健康对照者(HCs)在决策、元认知和执行功能之间的关系。
采用横断面比较组研究设计,样本量为40,每组20名参与者。所使用的工具包括迷你国际神经精神病学访谈、一般健康问卷、墨尔本决策问卷、元认知问卷、威斯康星卡片分类测验和受控口语联想测验。
与健康对照组相比,RDD组在推诿(BP)、拖延(PR)、过度警觉和功能失调的元认知信念方面得分显著更高,执行功能表现较差。在RDD组中,PR与执行功能和功能失调的元认知信念呈负相关,而在健康对照组中,BP与执行功能和功能失调的元认知信念呈正相关。
决策与执行功能和功能失调的元认知信念存在显著关系;因此,任何一个变量的变化都会导致其他两个变量的变化。功能失调的元认知信念导致的注意力和执行控制改变会导致决策能力差,进而导致心理社会功能障碍。潜在的元认知信念和执行功能在决策中起关键作用,而决策过程决定心理社会功能。