Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.041. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Previous research suggests that elevated pulse pressure (PP) is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) independently of mean arterial pressure (MAP). PP may serve as an indirect measure of aortic stiffness (reduced distensibility), but whether directly measured aortic distensibility is related to risk for AF has not yet been studied. This analysis included 6,630 participants aged 45 to 84 years from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. At baseline, blood pressure and other relevant covariates were measured using standardized protocols. Magnetic resonance imaging-based aortic distensibility was measured in 3,441 participants. Incident AF was identified from hospitalization discharge codes and Medicare claims. Multivariate Cox models were used to estimate the association of blood pressure components and aortic distensibility with AF risk. During a mean follow-up of 7.8 years, 307 AF events (137 among those with aortic distensibility measurements) were identified. In multivariate-adjusted models simultaneously including MAP and PP, each 1-SD increase in PP was associated with a 29% increased risk of AF (95% confidence interval 5% to 59%, p = 0.02), with MAP not being associated with increased AF risk. Overall, aortic distensibility was not consistently associated with AF risk: after removing outliers, each 1-SD increase in aortic distensibility was associated with a 9% increased risk of AF (95% confidence interval -22% to 51%, p = 0.63). In conclusion, in this large community-based cohort, we found that PP, but not MAP or aortic distensibility, was a significant risk factor for AF, emphasizing the importance of PP when assessing the risk for developing AF. Our results cast doubt on the clinical utility of aortic distensibility as a predictor for the development of AF.
先前的研究表明,脉压(PP)升高是心房颤动(AF)的一个独立危险因素,而不考虑平均动脉压(MAP)。PP 可能是主动脉僵硬度(顺应性降低)的间接衡量标准,但直接测量的主动脉顺应性与 AF 风险之间的关系尚未得到研究。这项分析包括多民族动脉粥样硬化研究中的 6630 名年龄在 45 至 84 岁的参与者。在基线时,使用标准化方案测量血压和其他相关协变量。在 3441 名参与者中测量了基于磁共振成像的主动脉顺应性。从住院出院代码和医疗保险索赔中确定了 AF 的发病情况。使用多变量 Cox 模型来估计血压成分和主动脉顺应性与 AF 风险的关联。在平均 7.8 年的随访期间,确定了 307 例 AF 事件(在有主动脉顺应性测量的患者中 137 例)。在同时包含 MAP 和 PP 的多变量调整模型中,PP 每增加 1-SD,AF 的风险增加 29%(95%置信区间为 5%至 59%,p=0.02),而 MAP 与 AF 风险增加无关。总体而言,主动脉顺应性与 AF 风险并不一致相关:在去除异常值后,主动脉顺应性每增加 1-SD,AF 的风险增加 9%(95%置信区间为-22%至 51%,p=0.63)。总之,在这项大型社区队列研究中,我们发现 PP 而不是 MAP 或主动脉顺应性是 AF 的一个重要危险因素,这强调了在评估发生 AF 的风险时评估 PP 的重要性。我们的结果对主动脉顺应性作为 AF 发展预测因子的临床实用性提出了质疑。