Suppr超能文献

实用随机最佳血小板与血浆比例(PROPPR)试验:设计、原理与实施

Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial: design, rationale and implementation.

作者信息

Baraniuk Sarah, Tilley Barbara C, del Junco Deborah J, Fox Erin E, van Belle Gerald, Wade Charles E, Podbielski Jeanette M, Beeler Angela M, Hess John R, Bulger Eileen M, Schreiber Martin A, Inaba Kenji, Fabian Timothy C, Kerby Jeffrey D, Cohen Mitchell Jay, Miller Christopher N, Rizoli Sandro, Scalea Thomas M, O'Keeffe Terence, Brasel Karen J, Cotton Bryan A, Muskat Peter, Holcomb John B

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.

出版信息

Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1287-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Forty percent of in-hospital deaths among injured patients involve massive truncal haemorrhage. These deaths may be prevented with rapid haemorrhage control and improved resuscitation techniques. The Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial was designed to determine if there is a difference in mortality between subjects who received different ratios of FDA approved blood products. This report describes the design and implementation of PROPPR.

STUDY DESIGN

PROPPR was designed as a randomized, two-group, Phase III trial conducted in subjects with the highest level of trauma activation and predicted to have a massive transfusion. Subjects at 12 North American level 1 trauma centres were randomized into one of two standard transfusion ratio interventions: 1:1:1 or 1:1:2, (plasma, platelets, and red blood cells). Clinical data and serial blood samples were collected under Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) regulations. Co-primary mortality endpoints of 24h and 30 days were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between August 2012 and December 2013, 680 patients were randomized. The overall median time from admission to randomization was 26min. PROPPR enrolled at higher than expected rates with fewer than expected protocol deviations.

CONCLUSION

PROPPR is the largest randomized study to enrol severely bleeding patients. This study showed that rapidly enrolling and successfully providing randomized blood products to severely injured patients in an EFIC study is feasible. PROPPR was able to achieve these goals by utilizing a collaborative structure and developing successful procedures and design elements that can be part of future trauma studies.

摘要

背景

受伤患者中40%的院内死亡涉及大量躯干出血。通过快速控制出血和改进复苏技术,这些死亡可能得以避免。实用随机最佳血小板与血浆比例(PROPPR)试验旨在确定接受不同比例美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的血液制品的受试者之间死亡率是否存在差异。本报告描述了PROPPR的设计与实施情况。

研究设计

PROPPR设计为一项随机、两组、III期试验,在创伤激活程度最高且预计会接受大量输血的受试者中进行。北美12家一级创伤中心的受试者被随机分为两种标准输血比例干预措施之一:1:1:1或1:1:2(血浆、血小板和红细胞)。根据知情同意豁免(EFIC)规定收集临床数据和系列血样。评估24小时和30天的共同主要死亡率终点。

结果

2012年8月至2013年12月期间,680例患者被随机分组。从入院到随机分组的总体中位时间为26分钟。PROPPR的入组率高于预期,方案偏差少于预期。

结论

PROPPR是纳入严重出血患者的最大规模随机研究。这项研究表明,在EFIC研究中快速纳入并成功为重伤患者提供随机血液制品是可行的。PROPPR通过采用协作结构以及开发可成为未来创伤研究一部分的成功程序和设计要素实现了这些目标。

相似文献

3
Damage-control resuscitation and emergency laparotomy: Findings from the PROPPR study.损伤控制复苏与急诊剖腹手术:PROPPR研究的结果
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Apr;80(4):568-74; discussion 574-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000960.

引用本文的文献

3
Blood transfusion strategies for major bleeding in trauma.创伤大出血的输血策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):CD012635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012635.pub2.
7

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验