General Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jul 16;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00554-7.
Emergency general surgeons often provide care to severely ill patients requiring surgical interventions and intensive support. One of the primary drivers of morbidity and mortality is perioperative bleeding. In general, when addressing life threatening haemorrhage, blood transfusion can become an essential part of overall resuscitation. However, under all circumstances, indications for blood transfusion must be accurately evaluated. When patients decline blood transfusions, regardless of the reason, surgeons should aim to provide optimal care and respect and accommodate each patient's values and target the best outcome possible given the patient's desires and his/her clinical condition. The aim of this position paper was to perform a review of the existing literature and to provide comprehensive recommendations on organizational, surgical, anaesthetic, and haemostatic strategies that can be used to provide optimal peri-operative blood management, reduce, or avoid blood transfusions and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
急诊普通外科医生经常为需要手术干预和强化支持的重症患者提供治疗。发病率和死亡率的主要驱动因素之一是围手术期出血。一般来说,在处理危及生命的出血时,输血可能成为整体复苏的重要组成部分。然而,在任何情况下,都必须准确评估输血的指征。当患者拒绝输血时,无论原因如何,外科医生都应旨在提供最佳的护理,并尊重和适应每个患者的价值观,并根据患者的愿望和临床状况为其提供尽可能好的结果。本立场文件的目的是对现有文献进行审查,并就可以用于提供最佳围手术期血液管理、减少或避免输血并最终改善患者预后的组织、手术、麻醉和止血策略提供全面建议。