College of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.
College of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.
Chemosphere. 2014 Sep;111:604-12. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.082. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
This study proposes an environmental- and health-risk-induced remediation design approach for benzene-contaminated groundwater. It involves exposure frequency and intake rates that are important but difficult to be exactly quantified as breakthrough point. Flexible health-risk control is considered in the simulation and optimization work. The proposed approach is then applied to a petroleum-contaminated site in western Canada. Different situations about remediation durations, public concerns, and satisfactory degrees are addressed by the approach. The relationship between environmental standards and health-risk limits is analyzed, in association with their effect on remediation costs. Insights of three uncertain factors (i.e. exposure frequency, intake rate and health-risk threshold) for the remediation system are also explored, on a basis of understanding their impacts on health risk as well as their importance order. The case study results show that (1) nature attenuation plays a more important role in long-term remediation scheme than the pump-and-treat system; (2) carcinogenic risks have greater impact on total pumping rates than environmental standards for long-term remediation; (3) intake rates are the second important factor affecting the remediation system's performance, followed by exposure frequency; (4) the 10-year remediation scheme is the most robust choice when environmental and health-risk concerns are not well quantified.
本研究提出了一种受环境和健康风险影响的地下水苯污染修复设计方法。它涉及到暴露频率和摄入率,这些因素虽然重要,但很难准确量化作为突破点。在模拟和优化工作中考虑了灵活的健康风险控制。然后,该方法应用于加拿大西部的一个石油污染场地。该方法解决了修复持续时间、公众关注和满意度等不同情况。分析了环境标准与健康风险限值之间的关系,以及它们对修复成本的影响。还探讨了修复系统中三个不确定因素(即暴露频率、摄入率和健康风险阈值)的关系,以了解它们对健康风险的影响及其重要性顺序。案例研究结果表明:(1)自然衰减在长期修复方案中比泵和处理系统更为重要;(2)对于长期修复,致癌风险对总抽提率的影响大于环境标准;(3)摄入率是影响修复系统性能的第二个重要因素,其次是暴露频率;(4)当环境和健康风险的关注不能很好地量化时,10 年修复方案是最稳健的选择。