School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China,
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(12):9505-14. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4081-y. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
The conventional multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods used for pollution control generally depend on the data currently available. This could limit their real-world applications, especially where the input data (e.g., the most cost-effective remediation cost and eventual contaminant concentration) might vary by scenario. This study proposes an optimization-based MCDA (OMCDA) framework to address such a challenge. It is capable of (1) capturing various preferences of decision-makers, (2) screening and analyzing the performance of various optimized remediation strategies under changeable scenarios, and (3) compromising incongruous decision analysis results. A real-world case study is employed for demonstration, where four scenarios are considered with each one corresponding to a set of weights representative of the preference of the decision-makers. Four criteria are selected, i.e., optimal total pumping rate, remediation cost, contaminant concentration, and fitting error. Their values are determined through running optimization and optimization-based simulation procedures. Four sets of the most desired groundwater remediation strategies are identified, implying specific pumping rates under varied scenarios. Results indicate that the best action lies in groups 32 and 16 for the 5-year, groups 49 and 36 for the 10-year, groups 26 and 13 for the 15-year, and groups 47 and 13 for the 20-year remediation.
传统的用于污染控制的多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法通常依赖于当前可用的数据。这可能会限制它们在现实世界中的应用,特别是在输入数据(例如,最具成本效益的修复成本和最终污染物浓度)可能因情况而异的情况下。本研究提出了一种基于优化的 MCDA(OMCDA)框架来应对这一挑战。它能够(1)捕捉决策者的各种偏好,(2)在变化的情景下筛选和分析各种优化修复策略的性能,以及(3)折衷不一致的决策分析结果。采用一个实际案例研究进行演示,其中考虑了四个情景,每个情景对应一组代表决策者偏好的权重。选择了四个标准,即最优总抽提率、修复成本、污染物浓度和拟合误差。通过运行优化和基于优化的模拟程序来确定它们的值。确定了四组最理想的地下水修复策略,暗示了在不同情景下的特定抽提率。结果表明,在 5 年、10 年、15 年和 20 年修复的情况下,最佳行动分别位于第 32 和第 16 组、第 49 和第 36 组、第 26 和第 13 组以及第 47 和第 13 组。