Weidmer Beverly A, Cleary Paul D, Keller San, Evensen Christian, Hurtado Margarita P, Kosiak Beth, Gallagher Patricia M, Levine Roger, Hays Ron D
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Nov;64(5):753-60. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
The US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services assess patient experiences of care as part of the end-stage renal disease prospective payment system and Quality Incentive Program. This article describes the development and evaluation of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.
We conducted formative research to generate survey questions and performed statistical analyses to evaluate the survey's measurement properties.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Formative research included focus groups, cognitive interviews, and field testing the survey with dialysis patients.
MEASUREMENTS & OUTCOMES: We assessed internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha) and center-level reliability for 3 multi-item scales. We evaluated construct validity using correlations of the scales with global ratings of the kidney doctor, staff, and dialysis center.
Response rate was 46% (1,454 completed surveys). Analyses support 3 multi-item scales: Nephrologists' Communication and Caring (7 items, alpha=0.89), Quality of Dialysis Center Care and Operations (22 items, alpha=0.93), and Providing Information to Patients (11 items, alpha=0.75). The communication scale was correlated the most strongly with the global rating of the "kidney doctor" (r=0.78). The Dialysis Center Care and Operations scale was correlated most strongly with global ratings of staff (r=0.75) and the center (r=0.69). Providing Information to Patients was correlated most strongly with the global rating of the staff (r=0.41).
A relatively small number of patients completed the survey in Spanish.
This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the CAHPS In-Center Hemodialysis Survey for assessing patient experiences of care at dialysis facilities. The survey can be used to compare care provided at different facilities.
美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心将患者的护理体验评估作为终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统和质量激励计划的一部分。本文介绍了医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)中心内血液透析调查的开发与评估。
我们进行了形成性研究以生成调查问题,并进行统计分析以评估该调查的测量属性。
形成性研究包括焦点小组、认知访谈以及对透析患者进行该调查的现场测试。
我们评估了3个多项目量表的内部一致性信度(克朗巴哈α系数)和中心层面的信度。我们通过这些量表与肾病医生、工作人员和透析中心总体评分的相关性来评估结构效度。
回复率为46%(1454份完成的调查问卷)。分析支持3个多项目量表:肾病医生的沟通与关怀(7项,α = 0.89)、透析中心护理与运营质量(22项,α = 0.93)以及向患者提供信息(11项,α = 0.75)。沟通量表与“肾病医生”的总体评分相关性最强(r = 0.78)。透析中心护理与运营量表与工作人员的总体评分(r = 0.75)和中心的总体评分(r = 0.69)相关性最强。向患者提供信息与工作人员的总体评分相关性最强(r = 0.41)。
完成西班牙语调查问卷的患者数量相对较少。
本研究为CAHPS中心内血液透析调查在评估透析机构患者护理体验方面的信度和效度提供了支持。该调查可用于比较不同机构提供的护理。