RAND Corporation, 4570, 5th Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-2665, USA.
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2019 Nov;28(11):3117-3135. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02250-5. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
End-stage renal disease patients' experience of care is an integral part of the assessment of the quality of the care provided at hemodialysis centers and is needed to promote patient choice, quality improvement, and accountability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS®) survey and its equivalence in different age, gender, race, and education subgroups.
The ICH-CAHPS survey was administered to 1454 patients from 32 dialysis facilities. For the characteristics compared, the sample had 756 participants younger than 65 years old, 739 men, 516 Black, 567 White, and 970 with less than high school diploma. Three different patient experience constructs were studied including nephrologist's communication and caring, quality of care and operations, and providing information to patients. We used item response theory analysis to examine the possibility of differential item functioning (DIF) by patient age, gender, race, and education separately after controlling for the other DIF characteristics and additional confounding variables including survey mode, mental, and general health status as well as duration on dialysis.
The three constructs studied were unidimensional and no major DIF was observed on the composites. Some non-equivalences were observed when confounders were not controlled for, suggesting that such covariates can be important factors in understanding the possibility of disparity in patients' experience.
The ICH-CAHPS is a promising survey to elicit hemodialysis patients' experience that has good psychometric properties and provides a standardized tool for assessing age, gender, race, or education disparity.
终末期肾病患者的护理体验是评估血液透析中心提供护理质量的一个组成部分,有助于促进患者选择、质量改进和问责制。本研究旨在评估中心血液透析患者医疗保健提供者和系统评估调查(ICH-CAHPS®)及其在不同年龄、性别、种族和教育亚组中的等效性。
对来自 32 个透析中心的 1454 名患者进行了 ICH-CAHPS 调查。对于比较的特征,样本中 756 名参与者年龄小于 65 岁,739 名男性,516 名黑人,567 名白人,970 名参与者未完成高中学业。研究了三个不同的患者体验结构,包括肾病医生的沟通和关怀、护理质量和运营,以及向患者提供信息。我们使用项目反应理论分析,在控制其他 DIF 特征和额外的混杂变量(包括调查模式、心理和一般健康状况以及透析时间)后,分别按患者年龄、性别、种族和教育对可能的差异项目功能(DIF)进行了研究。
所研究的三个结构是单维的,在综合指标上没有观察到重大的 DIF。在没有控制混杂因素的情况下,观察到了一些非等效性,这表明这些混杂因素可能是理解患者体验差异的重要因素。
ICH-CAHPS 是一种有前途的调查工具,可以了解血液透析患者的体验,具有良好的心理测量学特性,并为评估年龄、性别、种族或教育差异提供了标准化工具。