• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善持久精神疾病患者的社会功能,减少其社会孤立和孤独感:支持社交的随机对照试验报告。

Improving social functioning and reducing social isolation and loneliness among people with enduring mental illness: Report of a randomised controlled trial of supported socialisation.

机构信息

UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 May;61(3):241-50. doi: 10.1177/0020764014540150. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1177/0020764014540150
PMID:25001267
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This randomised controlled trial examined if for people with enduring mental illness, being supported to socialise leads to improved social functioning, increased self-esteem and extended social networks; a reduction in social isolation, social, emotional and family loneliness and a reduction in illness symptoms, namely depression.

METHODS

A prospective randomised controlled trial was undertaken from November 2007 to September 2011. Service users with a diagnosis of enduring mental illness (>18 years) were invited to participate. Participants were randomly allocated to intervention or control group conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Intervention group participants were matched with a volunteer partner, asked to engage in social/leisure activities for 2 hours weekly over a 9-month period, and received a €20 stipend monthly. Control group participants received a €20 monthly stipend and were asked to engage in a weekly social/leisure activity. Social functioning, the primary outcome, was measured using the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) at three time points (baseline, midpoint and endpoint).

FINDINGS

In all, 107 people completed this study. There were no significant differences between control and intervention groups at the commencement of the intervention on demographic characteristics or the main outcome measures of interest. Overall social functioning positively changed throughout the three time points from a mean of 99·7 (standard deviation (SD) = 15.1) at baseline, to a mean of 106.0 (SD = 27.0) at the endpoint for the control group, and from a mean of 100·4 (SD = 15.0) at Time 1 for the intervention group, to a mean of 104.1 (SD = 23.4) at the endpoint for the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention showed no statistical differences between the control and intervention groups on primary or secondary outcome measures. The stipend and the stipend plus volunteer partner led to an increase in recreational social functioning; a decrease in levels of social loneliness, in depression and in the proportion living within a vulnerable social network.

摘要

背景

本随机对照试验旨在探讨对于患有持续性精神疾病的人群,通过支持其社交活动,是否能改善社交功能、提高自尊、扩展社交网络;减少社交孤立、社交、情感和家庭孤独感,并减轻疾病症状,如抑郁。

方法

本前瞻性随机对照试验于 2007 年 11 月至 2011 年 9 月进行。邀请被诊断为持续性精神疾病(>18 岁)的服务使用者参与。参与者以 1:1 的比例随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组的参与者与志愿者伙伴配对,要求他们在 9 个月内每周进行 2 小时的社交/休闲活动,并每月获得 20 欧元的津贴。对照组的参与者每月获得 20 欧元的津贴,并被要求每周参加社交/休闲活动。社交功能是主要结局指标,使用社交功能量表(SFS)在三个时间点(基线、中点和终点)进行测量。

结果

共有 107 人完成了这项研究。在干预开始时,对照组和干预组在人口统计学特征或主要观察指标上没有显著差异。从基线时的平均 99.7(标准差(SD)=15.1)到对照组的终点时的平均 106.0(SD=27.0),再到干预组的时间 1 时的平均 100.4(SD=15.0)到干预组的终点时的平均 104.1(SD=23.4),总体社交功能在三个时间点均呈正性变化。

结论

干预组在主要或次要结局指标上与对照组无统计学差异。津贴和津贴加志愿者伙伴导致娱乐社交功能增加;社交孤独感、抑郁程度以及处于脆弱社交网络中的比例降低。

相似文献

1
Improving social functioning and reducing social isolation and loneliness among people with enduring mental illness: Report of a randomised controlled trial of supported socialisation.改善持久精神疾病患者的社会功能,减少其社会孤立和孤独感:支持社交的随机对照试验报告。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 May;61(3):241-50. doi: 10.1177/0020764014540150. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
2
Friendship and money: A qualitative study of service users' experiences of participating in a supported socialisation programme.友谊与金钱:一项关于服务使用者参与支持性社交项目体验的定性研究。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;64(4):326-334. doi: 10.1177/0020764018763692. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
3
Effects of psychosocial group rehabilitation on social functioning, loneliness and well-being of lonely, older people: randomized controlled trial.心理社会小组康复对孤独老年人社会功能、孤独感和幸福感的影响:随机对照试验
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Feb;65(2):297-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04837.x. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
4
The contribution of self-efficacy, social support and participation in the community to predicting loneliness among persons with schizophrenia living in supported residences.自我效能感、社会支持以及社区参与对预测居住在支持性住所中的精神分裂症患者孤独感的作用。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2009;46(2):120-9.
5
Evaluating an intervention to reduce fear of falling and associated activity restriction in elderly persons: design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN43792817].评估一项旨在减少老年人跌倒恐惧及相关活动受限的干预措施:一项随机对照试验的设计 [国际标准随机对照试验编号43792817]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Mar 21;5:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-26.
6
Study protocol for 'The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)': a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people.《孤独与社交网络研究计划(PALS)》研究方案:一项实用随机对照试验,比较促进社交网络干预(Genie)与孤独和社交孤立人群的候补名单对照。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e028718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028718.
7
The Community Navigator Study: Results from a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a programme to reduce loneliness for people with complex anxiety or depression.社区导航员研究:一项旨在减少复杂焦虑或抑郁人群孤独感的方案的可行性随机对照试验结果。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233535. eCollection 2020.
8
Walk, Talk and Listen: a pilot randomised controlled trial targeting functional fitness and loneliness in older adults with hearing loss.行走、交谈和倾听:一项针对听力损失老年人功能性健康和孤独感的试点随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 14;9(4):e026169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026169.
9
Effects of a peer-run course on recovery from serious mental illness: a randomized controlled trial.同伴运行课程对严重精神疾病康复的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jan;63(1):54-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201000450.
10
Older people going online: its value and before-after evaluation of volunteer support.老年人上网:其价值及志愿者支持的前后评估
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 18;17(5):e122. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3943.

引用本文的文献

1
The internalized stigma, self-efficacy, occupational competence and employment outcome among persons with severe mental illness under one-to-one peer support services in Taiwan.台湾一对一同伴支持服务下重度精神疾病患者的内化耻辱感、自我效能感、职业能力和就业结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06849-6.
2
Interventions in ambulatory healthcare settings to reduce social isolation among adults aged 18-64: a systematic review.在门诊医疗环境中采取干预措施以减少18至64岁成年人的社会隔离:一项系统综述。
BJGP Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0119. Print 2024 Dec.
3
1 plus 1 is more than 2: mental health problems, financial difficulties, and social exclusion in a cross-sectional study of 28,047 general-population adults.
1加1大于2:在一项针对28047名成年普通人群的横断面研究中的心理健康问题、经济困难和社会排斥
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):1148. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18555-1.
4
Exploring the use of social network interventions for adults with mental health difficulties: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.探索社交网络干预措施在心理健康有困难的成年人中的应用:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 7;23(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04881-y.
5
Off the RADAR; questions regarding the trial protocol of a randomised controlled trial of antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation.雷达下的盲区;抗精神病药物减量和停药随机对照试验试验方案的相关问题。
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Apr;37(4):378-380. doi: 10.1177/02698811221144633. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
6
Interventions to improve social circumstances of people with mental health conditions: a rapid evidence synthesis.改善心理健康状况人群社会环境的干预措施:快速证据综合评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03864-9.
7
The Lost Social Context of Recovery Psychiatrization of a Social Process.康复的迷失社会背景:一个社会过程的精神病化
Front Sociol. 2022 Apr 4;7:832201. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.832201. eCollection 2022.
8
Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Loneliness and Isolation During Social Distancing and Its Effect on Mental Health.社交距离期间测量孤独感和隔离感的量表的构建与验证及其对心理健康的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 5;13:798596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.798596. eCollection 2022.
9
Assessing the effectiveness of social network interventions for adults with a diagnosis of mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of impact.评估社交网络干预措施对有心理健康问题诊断的成年人的有效性:影响的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 May;57(5):907-925. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02242-w. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
10
Can social support be improved in people with a severe mental illness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.能否改善重症精神疾病患者的社会支持?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 31:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02694-4.