Mental Health Research Group, Jean McFarlane Building, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 May;57(5):907-925. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02242-w. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
Social connections have been linked to the genesis and amelioration of mental health problems and thus have potential therapeutic value.
To identify the current evidence base, assess risk of bias and synthesise findings on the effectiveness of social network interventions for people with mental health problems.
Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus) and grey literature databases were systematically searched from inception to October 2021 using free text syntax combining synonyms for 'mental health problems' and 'social network interventions'. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported data from randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve social networks for adults (18+) with mental health problems. Papers were independently reviewed for inclusion with conflicts resolved through consensus. Included papers were quality assessed and data extracted and synthesized narratively. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Nine studies randomising 2226 participants were included. Four focused on those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or psychosis, one on major depressive disorder and four included all types of mental health diagnoses. The current evidence base is of unclear quality. However, interventions which focused on supporting social activities appear to hold the most promise for enhancing social networks. Data on cost-effectiveness and research acceptability were limited, but suggest the potential economic feasibility of and acceptability for evaluating these interventions.
There is emerging evidence that social network interventions can be effective in improving social connections for people with mental health problems. However, further evaluations with robust methodological approaches are required to inform evidence-based recommendations for health services.
社会关系与心理健康问题的产生和改善有关,因此具有潜在的治疗价值。
确定当前的证据基础,评估偏倚风险,并综合评估针对心理健康问题人群的社交网络干预措施的有效性研究结果。
系统检索了从建库到 2021 年 10 月的电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、Scopus)和灰色文献数据库,使用结合了“心理健康问题”和“社交网络干预”同义词的自由文本语法进行组合检索。如果文章报告了旨在改善有心理健康问题的成年人(18 岁以上)社交网络的干预措施的有效性的随机对照试验数据,则文章可纳入。独立评估文章的纳入情况,通过共识解决冲突。对纳入的文章进行质量评估,并提取和叙述性综合数据。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。
纳入了 9 项随机分配 2226 名参与者的研究。其中 4 项研究的重点是精神分裂症或精神病患者,1 项研究的重点是重度抑郁症患者,4 项研究纳入了所有类型的心理健康诊断。目前的证据基础质量不明确。然而,专注于支持社交活动的干预措施似乎最有希望增强社交网络。关于成本效益和研究可接受性的数据有限,但表明评估这些干预措施具有潜在的经济可行性和可接受性。
有新的证据表明,社交网络干预措施可以有效改善有心理健康问题人群的社交联系。然而,需要进一步采用稳健的方法进行评估,以提供针对卫生服务的循证建议。